Dating Violence, Parent, Primary Care
Conditions
Keywords
dating violence prevention, parental monitoring and communication, pilot trial, middle school
Brief summary
ETHR V 2.0 pilot trial is a one-arm, multi-site pilot trial to assess the acceptability and feasibility of Engaging Together for Healthy Relationships, a caregiver-adolescent dating violence prevention program delivered within pediatric primary care.
Detailed description
ETHR V 2.0 pilot trial is a one-arm (intervention only) pilot trial of Engaging Together for Healthy Relationships, a caregiver-adolescent dating violence prevention program delivered within pediatric primary care. We completed one round of the pilot trial in two clinics in Pittsburgh and now are expanding the trial to include two sites with all providers in each site. ETHR includes clinician training, in-clinic resources, and after visit text messages and resources for families. This is an intervention only trial to assess acceptability, feasibility, and exploratory pre/post changes in outcomes.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALEngaging Together for Health Relationships
Dating violence intervention for caregivers and adolescents to be delivered within pediatric primary care
Sponsors
University of Pittsburgh
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Providers: 1. Sees patient at an eligible primary care clinic 2. Speaks and understands English 3. Age 18 or older 4. Identifies as a pediatrician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant (pediatric primary care healthcare provider) Adolescents 1. Age 12 to 16 2. Attending an upcoming well-child visit from a provider enrolled in the study 3. Caregiver who is accompanying well-child visit with adolescent is also participating 4. Speaks and understands English Parents 1. Is parent or primary caregiver for an adolescent age 12 to 16 2. Adolescent has an upcoming well-child visit with a provider enrolled in the study 3. Accompanying child to the well-visit 4. Adolescent is interested and eligible to participate in study 5. Speaks and understand English
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to assent/consent * Does not meet inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of participants who are eligible out of the total who are approached | Through completion of study recruitment, an average of 6 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who are consented out of the total who are eligible | Through completion of study recruitment, an average of 6 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who complete the baseline survey out of the total who consented | Through completion of completing baseline surveys, an average of 6 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who complete the well-visit out of the total who consented | Through completion of completing well-visits, an average of 6 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who complete the immediate post-intervention survey out of the total who consented | Through completion of completing post-intervention survey, an average of 7 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who complete the 1-month post-intervention survey out of the total who consented | 4 months | Through completion of completing 1- month post-intervention survey, an average of 8 months |
| Percentage of participants who complete the 3-month post-intervention survey out of the total who consented | Through completion of completing 3 month post-intervention survey, an average of 12 months | Will assess through tracking data |
| Percentage of participants who strongly agree or agree that the intervention is acceptable using a 4-item validated measure (Acceptability of Intervention Measure) | Through completion of completing immediate post-visit surveys, an average of 6 months | Validated measure (Acceptability of Intervention Measure) |
| Percent of participants who received intervention during pediatric primary care visit | Through completion of completing well-visits, an average of 6 months | Investigator-developed measure with questions about what components of the intervention were received during the well visit |
| Participants use intervention resources after the visit | Through completion of intervention, on average 3 months post well visit | Investigator-developed measure on use of intervention resources after the visit |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy in preventing adolescent relationship abuse (ARA), change in outcome between baseline and 3 months | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | Self-efficacy around ARA prevention, 1-5 scale (5=higher self-efficacy) |
| Percentage of participants who utilize ARA resources at each measurement point, change in outcome over time | Baseline, 1 month post intervention, 3 month post-intervention | Investigator developed measure (yes/no) |
| Attitudes about ARA, change in outcome between baseline and 3 months | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | Attitudes about Abusive Relationships, 1-5 scale (1=not abusive, 5=very abusive) |
| Motivation around preventing dating violence | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | Investigator developed measure, 1-5 scale (1=not motivated, 5=very motivated) |
| Parent-adolescent communication around dating and ARA, change in outcome over time | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | Investigator developed measure, yes/no answer choices (yes=has communicated, no=has not communicated) |
| Parental monitoring around dating and ARA, change in outcome over time | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | Investigator developed measure, 1-5 scale (1=never; 5=always) |
| Percentage of adolescents reporting ARA victimization and perpetration | Baseline, 3-month post intervention | CADRI Short Form 1-5 scale (never to everyday) |
| ARA knowledge | baseline, 3 months surveys (6 months total) | 3 questions assessing ARA knowledge (yes/no answer choices) |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTErin Mickievicz, BA
CONTACTMaya Ragavan
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMaya Ragavan, MD, MPH, MS
University of Pittsburgh
Outcome results
None listed