Skip to content

Refining mUltiple Artificial intelliGence strateGies for Automatic Pain Assessment Investigations: RUGGI Study

Refining mUltiple Artificial intelliGence strateGies for Automatic Pain Assessment Investigations: RUGGI Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07038434
Acronym
RUGGI
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-06-26
Start date
2025-05-06
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2025-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Pain, Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Pain Assessment

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Automatic Pain Assessment, Facial Expression Analysis, Natural Language Processing, Stroop Test, Bio-signals, Chronic Pain

Brief summary

This single-center, non-profit, observational-interventional study aims to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models for the automatic assessment of chronic pain (APA - Automatic Pain Assessment). The study will enroll adult patients with chronic pain of various origins (oncologic and non-oncologic). Participants will undergo multidimensional evaluations that include clinical assessments, self-report questionnaires, bio-signal collection (e.g., EEG, EDA, HRV, GSR, PPG), and facial expression analysis via infrared thermography and video recordings. The primary objective is to calibrate and test machine learning and deep learning models to recognize and predict the presence and severity of pain using multimodal data inputs. Secondary objectives include evaluating the effectiveness of pain treatments, assessing quality of life, and developing a standardized APA dataset for future research. All data collection procedures are non-invasive and safe, and include tools like wearable sensors and standardized neurocognitive tests. The study is approved by the Italian Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Territoriale Campania 2) and complies with GDPR and EU AI regulations.

Detailed description

This study, titled Refining mUltiple artificial intelliGence strateGies for automatic pain assessment Investigations (RUGGI), explores the integration of AI in chronic pain evaluation. Pain is a multidimensional and subjective experience, and conventional assessment methods often rely solely on self-reported scales. This introduces the risk of over- or under-treatment. To overcome this limitation, the study leverages multimodal data-including physiological signals, facial expressions, and linguistic analysis-to build models capable of objectively assessing pain intensity and characteristics. The primary aim is to calibrate predictive models (e.g., Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Convolutional Neural Networks, YOLO architectures, and MLPs) that can recognize pain patterns using supervised and unsupervised learning. Bio-signals (EEG, HRV, GSR, EMG), infrared thermography (HIRA system), and prosodic-linguistic features will be analyzed. Data will be collected during structured timepoints: baseline (rest), Stroop test execution, and follow-up. Patients are recruited based on chronic pain diagnosis per IASP and ICD-11 criteria. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 and informed consent. The study foresees a target enrollment of approximately 200 patients within 6 months. Data will be processed following a rigorous AI pipeline, including preprocessing, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and cross-validation (k-fold with grid search optimization). Outcome measures include the Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and model explainability (via SHAP, LIME). Secondary outcomes include assessing patient-reported quality of life, evaluating analgesic strategies, and generating a public-use APA dataset. All procedures are compliant with Good Clinical Practice (GCP), GDPR, and EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Reg. 2024/1689). The study is conducted at the University Hospital San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona in Salerno, Italy.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMultimodal AI-Based Pain Assessment

A non-invasive, multimodal diagnostic procedure combining self-reported pain scales (NRS, DN-4, BPI), wearable biosignal acquisition (EDA, EMG, HRV, EEG), facial thermography (HIRA system), video-based facial expression analysis, linguistic interview, and the Stroop Test. Data are used to train and validate machine learning models for automatic pain assessment in chronic pain patients.

Sponsors

University of Salerno, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Federico II University
CollaboratorOTHER
Valentina Cerrone
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants receive the same diagnostic evaluation protocol, including clinical pain assessment, wearable bio-signal monitoring, neurocognitive testing, facial expression analysis, and language processing. The study is designed as a single-arm exploratory diagnostic protocol.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (≥18 years old) with chronic pain, defined according to IASP and ICD-11 as pain that persists or recurs for more than three months. * Diagnosed with either: * Chronic primary pain (e.g., fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches) * Chronic secondary non-cancer pain (e.g., low back pain, osteoarthritis, post-surgical pain) * Chronic cancer-related pain (due to cancer or its treatment) * Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Current treatment with psychotropic drugs or presence of active psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychosis, major depression). * Known history of alcohol or substance abuse. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Age under 18 years. * Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., due to cognitive impairment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUC-ROC of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 to Day 30The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) will be used to evaluate the model's ability to discriminate between pain and no-pain conditions across thresholds. Unit of measure: AUC-ROC (numeric value from 0 to 1)
Sensitivity of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 to Day 30Sensitivity (true positive rate) will be computed to determine the model's ability to correctly identify patients experiencing chronic pain. Unit of measure: Sensitivity (%)
Specificity of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 to Day 30Specificity (true negative rate) will be computed to assess the model's ability to correctly identify patients who are not experiencing chronic pain. Unit of measure: Specificity (%)
Precision of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 to Day 30Precision (positive predictive value) will be calculated to assess the proportion of correct positive predictions among all positive classifications. Unit of measure: Precision (%)
F1-score of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 to Day 30F1-score, the harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity, will be used to assess overall model performance, especially in the presence of class imbalance. Unit of measure: F1-score (numeric value)
Accuracy of AI models in classifying chronic painFrom Day 0 (baseline) to Day 30 (follow-up)Accuracy will be calculated to evaluate how well supervised machine learning and deep learning models can correctly classify the presence of chronic pain using multimodal data (e.g., biosignals, facial thermography, video, and audio).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference scoreFrom Day 0 to Day 30This outcome will measure how much pain interferes with daily functioning, using the BPI interference subscale. Unit of measure: Score from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference)
Correlation between analgesic treatments and pain intensity (NRS)From Day 0 to Day 30The outcome will assess the correlation between the type and frequency of analgesic treatments and changes in pain intensity, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Unit of measure: Pearson correlation coefficient (r), NRS scores from 0 to 10
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scoreFrom Day 0 to Day 30This outcome will measure patients' perceived improvement in their condition using the PGIC scale. Unit of measure: Score on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = No change to 7 = Very much improved)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Creation of a structured multimodal dataset for AI-based pain researchFrom Day 0 to Day 30A standardized and anonymized dataset will be developed from collected multimodal inputs (biosignals, thermography, facial videos, linguistic data, questionnaires) to enable future research. Unit of measure: Dataset availability (Yes/No)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMarco Cascella, MD, PhD
mcascella@unisa.it+39 089 672428
Backup ContactValentina Cerrone, RN, MSc
valentina.cerrone@sangiovannieruggi.it

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 17, 2026