Skip to content

Leave Nothing Behind Study Which Compares DCB With Bail Out BRS Versus BRS Strategy Alone

Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Show Long-term Efficacy of DCB Treatment With Bail-out BRS in Comparison to BRS Treatment of De-novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions in a Relatively Young PCI Population.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07038408
Acronym
LNB
Enrollment
2256
Registered
2025-06-26
Start date
2026-04-24
Completion date
2032-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Bioresorbable Scaffold, Drug Coated Balloon, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Keywords

MULTI-CENTER, OPEN-LABEL, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY, LONG-TERM EFFICACY OF DCB TREATMENT WITH BAIL-OUT BRS, BRS TREATMENT, DE-NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS, YOUNG PCI POPULATION

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the equivalence in early and long-term efficacy between the two "Leave nothing behind strategies" (Drug-Coated Baloon \[DCB\] strategy with bail-out BioResorbable Scaffold \[BRS\] versus BRS strategy) of de-novo native coronary artery lesions in a relatively young Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) population, to be more specific, Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) (Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction \[NSTEMI\] and Unstable angina) between 18-68 years of age scheduled for PCI. The main questions aim to answer are: DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 12 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has noninferior angiographic in-segment net gain at 13 months compared to BRS strategy? DCB strategy with bail-out BRS implantation has equivalent clinical outcomes at 60 months compared to BRS strategy? Participants will be followed at: 1. st FU visit - 1 month (in hospital) 2. nd FU visit - 6 months (telephone) 3. rd FU visit - 365 days±15 days (telephone) - 1Y Primary efficacy endpoint 4. th FU visit - 395 days±15 days (in hospital) co-primary efficacy endpoint for the angiographic substudy 5. th FU visit - 730 days±30 days (telephone call) - 2Y 6. th FU visit - 1095 days±30 days (telephone call) - 3Y 7. th FU visit - 1460 days±30 days (telephone call) - 4Y 8. th FU visit- 1825 days±30 days (telephone call) - 5Y

Detailed description

The Leave Nothing Behind Study is an is an investigator-initiated trial. The Primary efficacy endpoint is target-vessel failure (TVF), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Co-primary efficacy endpoint (angiographic substudy) is the in-segment net gain at 13 months. Investigators aim to enroll 2256 patients in the main study and 196 patients in the angiographic substudy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAngioplasty with DCB (bail-out BRS)

Angioplasty starts with lesion preparation in both arms with a PTCA balloon catheter. The lesion is treated with the Mozec SEB through femoral or brachial artery. The DCB should be delivered to the target lesion within 120 seconds of insertion into the guide catheter. Under fluoroscopic visualization, the DCB is inflated at least 30 seconds (single inflation). If the results are insufficient, multiple inflation is permitted. If despite appropriate delivery and inflation of the DCB, the results remain insufficient bail-out BRS should be performed. Bail-out BRS is performed through femoral or brachial artery. After correct positioning, the BRS is deployed slowly, i.e. 10 seconds/atm up to 4 atm, then 5 seconds/atm up to nominal pressure or higher until desired expansion is obtained. After desired expansion obtained, pressure is maintained for 30 seconds before balloon deflation. After BRS implantation, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is performed, if available.

PROCEDUREAngioplasty with BRS

Bail-out BRS is performed through femoral or brachial artery. BRS implantation is guided by OCT, if available. After correct positioning, the BRS is deployed slowly, i.e. 10 seconds/atm up to 4 atm, then 5 seconds/atm up to nominal pressure or higher until desired expansion is obtained. After desired expansion obtained, pressure is maintained for 30 seconds before balloon deflation. After BRS implantation, OCT is performed, if available.

Sponsors

Ceric Sàrl
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged ≥ 18 years ≤ 68 years * Single vessel or multivessel disease with low to moderate complex de-novo native coronary artery lesions up to 30 mm length and reference vessel diameter 2.75-4.0 mm * Maximum of 3 target lesions * Maximal cumulative lesion length of all treated lesions 80 mm * Signed informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) treatment at index or in the previous 48 hours * Severe calcified lesions * Bifurcations lesions with planned 2 device strategy * Left-Main (LM) disease ≥ 50% diameter stenosis * More than 3 target lesions * Renal insufficiency with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 45 ml/min * Life expectancy less than 1 year * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin or P2Y12 receptor inhibitors * Incapable of providing written informed consent * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Under judicial protection, tutorship, or curatorship * Participation in another trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target-vessel Failure (TVF)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 monthsTarget vessel failiure is defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target-Vessel Failure (TVF) at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.From enrollment to the end of treatment at every year from 2 years until 5 years follow-upTarget vessel failiure is defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization
Target-Lesion Failure (TLF)From enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 yearsTarget Lesion Failure is is defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization
(Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleedingsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 yearsBARC definitions Type 2: any overt, actionable sign of hemorrhage that does not fit the criteria for type 3, type 4, or type 5 but does meet at least one of the following criteria: requiring nonsurgical, medical intervention by a health care professional; leading to hospitalization or increased level of care; or prompting evaluation. Type 3a: overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 3 to 5 g/dL\* ; any transfusion with overt bleeding. Type 3b: overt bleeding plus a hemoglobin drop of 5 g/dL ; cardiac tamponade; bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control ; bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agens. Type 3c: intracranial hemorrhage
Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE)From enrollment to the end of treatment every year until end of 5 yearsNACE defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, all-stroke, ischemia driven TVR or BARC 3 or 5 bleeding

Countries

Estonia

Contacts

CONTACTDAVIDE CAPODANNO, Professor
dcapodanno@unict.it+39-3393238566
CONTACTCERC France
LeaveNothingBehind@cerc-europe.org

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026