Skip to content

To Determine the Effectiveness of TENS vs EMS on Hemodynamics Parameters of Hypertension

To Determine the Effectiveness of TENS vs EMS on Hemodynamics Parameters of Hypertension

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07037329
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-06-25
Start date
2025-03-04
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) on hemodynamic parameters in patients with hypertension. A total of 42 hypertensive patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group A received TENS, and Group B received EMS, over a period of four weeks. Pre- and post-treatment measurements of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded. Results showed that both TENS and EMS produced significant improvements in all parameters within their respective groups.

Detailed description

However, the TENS group demonstrated a greater reduction in SBP and DBP, while the EMS group showed better improvement in heart rate control. The findings suggest that both treatments are effective non-pharmacological options for managing hypertension, with TENS being more effective overall in lowering blood pressure. These modalities may offer supportive benefits in long-term hypertension management strategies.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

TENS is a non-invasive electrotherapy technique used to manage pain and modulate physiological responses such as blood pressure. In this study, patients in Group 1 received TENS therapy as the primary intervention.

EMS is a form of electrotherapy that causes muscle contractions through electrical impulses delivered via surface electrodes. In this study, patients in Group 2 received EMS therapy to investigate its effect on hemodynamic parameters in individuals with hypertension.

Sponsors

Superior University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (25-60 years) including both male and female * Patients clinically diagnosed with primary (essential) hypertension. * Blood pressure ranging from 140/90 mmHg to 160/100 mmHg (Stage 1 to early Stage 2 hypertension). * Participants who are not currently on intensive antihypertensive therapy or are on a stable dose of medication. * Willingness to participate voluntarily and provide written informed consent. * Patients who are not involved in any physical activity. * Participants who are overweight according to normal BMI.

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary hypertension due to renal, endocrine, or other systemic causes. Individuals with pacemakers, implanted defibrillators, or other electronic medical devices. * Patients with severe cardiovascular conditions, such as recent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or arrhythmias. History of seizure disorders or epilepsy. Cancer Patients * Presence of skin lesions, open wounds, or infections at the site of electrode placement. * Patients undergoing physiotherapy or electrical therapy elsewhere during the study period. * Individuals with known neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that could interfere with EMS or TENS effectiveness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-36 Health Survey (Optional for Quality of Life)6 MonthMeasures general health status and quality of life 36 items grouped into 8 domains (e.g., physical functioning, general health) Each domain scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026