Skip to content

Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study

Assessment of the Amount of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Denture Teeth Versus Conventionally Fabricated Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07035574
Acronym
3D-DENTURE
Enrollment
13
Registered
2025-06-25
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulism

Keywords

3D Printed Denture Teeth, Wear Analysis, Muscular Efficiency, Digital Dentistry

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the wear resistance and muscular efficiency of denture teeth fabricated using two different methods: 3D printing and conventional techniques. The research is designed as a crossover in vivo study, where completely edentulous patients will receive both types of dentures sequentially. The primary outcome is the amount of wear observed in the denture teeth over time, while the secondary outcome is the muscular efficiency measured using electromyography (EMG). The study seeks to determine whether 3D printed denture teeth offer advantages in durability and functionality compared to conventionally fabricated denture teeth. Results from this study may provide valuable insights into improving the quality and comfort of dentures for edentulous patients.

Detailed description

Complete dentures are a common treatment option for edentulous patients, providing essential functionality and aesthetics. With advancements in digital dentistry, 3D printing has emerged as a promising technique for fabricating denture teeth, offering potential benefits such as customization, faster production, and improved material properties. However, the long-term performance of 3D printed denture teeth compared to conventionally fabricated teeth remains under investigation. This study is designed to assess two critical aspects of denture teeth performance: wear resistance and muscular efficiency. Wear resistance refers to the ability of denture teeth to withstand forces during chewing without significant degradation, while muscular efficiency evaluates how effectively the jaw muscles function with the dentures during activities like chewing and speaking. The study will recruit completely edentulous patients aged 21-70 years from the Prosthodontics Department at Cairo University. Participants will receive two sets of complete dentures: one fabricated using conventional techniques and the other using 3D printing. The crossover design allows for direct comparison within the same group of patients, minimizing individual variability. Primary impressions will be taken, followed by the fabrication of dentures using standardized protocols. The amount of wear will be measured by scanning the denture teeth at delivery and after three months of use. Muscular efficiency will be assessed using electromyography (EMG) to measure bite force at delivery and after three months. This study is self-funded and conducted under the supervision of the Prosthodontics Department at Cairo University. Ethical approval has been obtained, and all participants will provide informed consent. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the advancement of prosthodontic practices, offering evidence-based recommendations for the use of 3D printed denture teeth in clinical settings.

Interventions

OTHERConventional Denture Teeth

Complete dentures fabricated using conventional techniques with prefabricated acrylic denture teeth.

OTHER3D Printed Denture Teeth

Complete dentures fabricated using additive manufacturing techniques with advanced resin materials.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study uses a crossover design where participants will receive two sets of complete dentures: one fabricated using conventional techniques and the other using 3D printing. This design minimizes individual variability and allows for direct comparison of outcomes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Completely edentulous patients. Aged 21-70 years old. Able to read and sign the informed consent document. Class Ι maxilla-mandibular relationship. Free from temporomandibular disorders. Free from systemic diseases that could affect neuromuscular behaviors or muscular activities. Edentulous condition falls within Class I and II cases based on the Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index (PDI) classification system for complete edentulism.

Exclusion criteria

Presence of major medical problems or severe chronic diseases. Poor residual ridge anatomy. Any intra-oral soft or hard tissue abnormalities. Flat, flabby, or knife-edge ridge anatomy. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of Wear6 monthsThe amount of wear observed in denture teeth fabricated using conventional techniques versus 3D printing technology. Denture teeth will be scanned at delivery and after 3 months of use, and the wear will be quantified by comparing the scans.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscular Efficiency6monthsMuscular efficiency will be assessed by measuring maximum bite force using electromyography (EMG) at delivery and after 3 months of use. The variation in bite force between conventional and 3D printed denture teeth will be analyzed.

Contacts

Primary Contacttuqa s madhi, B.D.S.
salahtuqa@yahoo.com+20 1221905983

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026