Skip to content

Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, da Vinci System

Comparing of Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, and daVinci in Whipple, Hepatectomy, Pancreatectomy, and Gastrectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07034495
Enrollment
486
Registered
2025-06-24
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Liver Tumors, Cholangiocarcinoma, Chronic Pancreatitis, Liver Neoplasms, Pancreatic Cysts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Periampullary Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms

Keywords

Whipple, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, gastrectomy robotic surger, da Vinci Xi

Brief summary

1. This study looks at whether newer surgical tools-like the da Vinci robotic system-can help patients recover better after major abdominal surgeries. It compares three surgery methods: traditional open surgery, standard laparoscopic (minimally invasive) surgery, and robotic surgery. 2. The research focused on four common operations: Stomach surgery (gastrectomy), Pancreas surgery (pancreatectomy), Liver surgery (hepatectomy) and andWhipple procedure 3. Researchers looked at medical records from 486 patients over five years. They compared how long each surgery took, how much blood was lost, and how many days patients stayed in the hospital. 4. The study wanted to see if robotic and laparoscopic surgeries help patients by making the surgery faster, safer, and with a quicker recovery. 5. The benefits depended on the type of surgery. In many cases, robotic and laparoscopic surgery led to shorter hospital stays, less bleeding, or faster surgeries. These results suggest that using newer technology can help make surgeries safer and recovery easier for patients.

Detailed description

1. The study was conducted with the assistance of Chung Shan Medical University's MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery) Center, which included the general surgery team with extensive experience in open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and Da Vinci surgery. The study collected a five-year dataset of patients from July 2015 to September 2019 at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital. A total of 486 patients (mean age = 57.96 ± 15.71 years) were enrolled in this study, comprising 269 males (mean age = 58.39 ± 15.49 years) and 217 female patients (mean age = 57.48 ± 16.00 years). All patients underwent robotic surgery for gastrectomy, liver resection, or pancreatectomy during the study period. 2. Regardless of the surgical methods (laparotomy, laparoscopy, or da Vinci system), the first step after the patient enters the operating room is always anesthesia. After administering anesthesia, the following different operation procedures result in different viewing images. During laparotomy, the surgeon opens the patient's body directly and operates with the naked eye. One disadvantage of laparotomy is that large wounds require more time to recover. In 2-dimensional (2D) image laparoscopy, a 2D screen shows an image that allows the surgeon to perform stereoscopic surgery. Although most surgical processes are similar between laparoscopy and robotic surgery, the imaging system has undergone significant improvements in robotic surgery. In surgery using the da Vinci system, an endoscope that captures high-definition 3-dimensional (3D) images from the surgical site is utilized. Images are processed using a video processor in the vision cart and displayed on a 3D viewer and touchscreen. 3. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze two or more variables, and statistical significance was set at p \< 0.05. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between three different groups of surgical methods and three perioperative outcomes (operative time, hospital stay, and bleeding) in the context of four Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery (HPB) surgeries.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Chung Hsing University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Chung Shan Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) 2. Underwent one of the following surgeries: gastrectomy, liver resection, or pancreatectomy 3. Received surgery at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital between July 2015 and September 2019 4. Surgery performed by the general surgery team with experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic (da Vinci) surgery 5. Surgical method included one of the following: open surgery (laparotomy), laparoscopic surgery, or robotic (da Vinci) surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who underwent surgeries outside the specified types (i.e., not gastrectomy, liver resection, or pancreatectomy) 2. Patients with incomplete or missing perioperative data (e.g., operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay) 3. Patients who underwent combined or staged surgical procedures unrelated to the HPB domain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operative timeFrom entry into the operating room for anesthesia induction to completion of skin closure at the end of surgery (Day 1, intraoperative period), assessed over an estimated duration of up to 10 hoursThe duration of the operation
bleedingFrom initiation of surgery (skin incision) to completion of wound closure during surgery (Day 1, intraoperative period), assessed over an estimated duration of up to 10 hours.The amount of intraoperative bleeding

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hospital stayFrom the date of surgery to the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 55 days postoperativelyThe postoperative recovery time

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026