Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia (PSVT), Rapid Arrhythmia
Conditions
Brief summary
This project aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of using FireMagic™ PreciSense™ 3D Microelectrode Ablation Catheter to treat rapid arrhythmias.
Detailed description
This project will conduct a clinical demonstration application study involving 300 cases, with the aim of evaluating the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of using FireMagic™ PreciSense™ 3D Microelectrode Ablation Catheter to treat rapid arrhythmias.
Interventions
All patients were treated withFireMagic™ PreciSense™ 3D Microelectrode Ablation Catheter、EasyStars™ High Density Mapping Catheter and Columbus™ 3D EP Navigation System for rapid arrhythmia.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1\. Inclusion Criteria 1. Patient age between 18 and 75 years old, male or non-pregnant female; 2. Confirmed diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation requiring catheter radiofrequency ablation surgery; 3. Signed informed consent form approved by the ethics committee; 4. Willingness to undergo follow-up and evaluation as required by the protocol. 2\.
Exclusion criteria
Include: 1.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| major evaluation indicators--Efficacy indicators | On the day of the surgery | Immediate success rate of the investigational device in treating rapid arrhythmias; |
| Major evaluation indicators--Monitoring methods | On the day of the surgery | Radiofrequency ablation treatment of rapid arrhythmias (such as supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation) using the trial device, with immediate ablation success determined based on the operator's professional experience combined with real-time intracardiac electrocardiogram display, followed by statistical analysis; |
| Major evaluation indicators--Safety indicators:Perioperative study of the incidence of adverse events related to medical devices | perioperative period | Statistics on the incidence of adverse events related to surgical instruments during the perioperative period |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the surface temperature of the ablated tissue | During surgery | extract multiple surface temperature data through tissue temperature measurement catheter microelectrodes and perform statistical analysis; |
| Changes in ablation point impedance | During surgery | evaluate secondary indicators of tissue temperature measurement catheters, observe the impedance display of the radiofrequency ablation device, and record whether the impedance decreases during ablation |