Skip to content

Lumbar Support Belt for Low-Back Pain in Office Workers

Effects of Wearing a Lumbar Support Belt on Low-Back Pain, Physical Fatigue During Computer Use, and Work Performance: A Pilot Parallel-Group Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07030816
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-06-22
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2025-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain, Low Back Pain (LBP), Non-specific Low Back Pain

Keywords

Lumbar support belt, Elastic lumbar belt, Office workers, Workplace intervention, Presenteeism, Fatigue, Randomised controlled trial

Brief summary

Background: Low-back pain (LBP) is common among office workers and can reduce productivity and quality of life. Lumbar support belts are commonly used to manage LBP, but their effectiveness specifically for office workers remains uncertain. Aim: This study investigates whether wearing a commercially available lumbar support belt (Guardner Belt) can reduce low-back pain, decrease physical fatigue during computer work, and improve perceived work performance among office workers with chronic low-back pain. Methods: Thirty office workers with chronic nonspecific low-back pain were randomly assigned to either wear the lumbar support belt during work hours for four weeks or continue usual activities without the belt. Participants' pain, fatigue, and work performance were assessed before and after the intervention period.

Detailed description

Study Design: A single-centre, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial conducted at a logistics company in Okinawa, Japan. Participants: Inclusion criteria: full-time office workers aged 20 to 65 years, chronic nonspecific low-back pain intensity ≥ 30 mm (100-mm visual analogue scale; VAS). Exclusion criteria: prior lumbar surgery, ongoing pharmacologic treatment for low-back pain, anticipated changes in job duties during the trial period. Interventions: * Belt Group: Participants wore a commercially available elastic lumbar support belt (Guardner Belt) sized according to waist circumference. Participants were instructed to wear the belt for at least 8 hours daily during their working hours over a 4-week period. * Control Group: Participants continued normal daily routines without any lumbar support belt. Primary Outcome Measures: Assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention: * Low-back pain intensity: Measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). * Physical fatigue during computer work: Measured using a 100-mm VAS. * Work performance: Measured using the Single-Item Presenteeism Question (SPQ), scored from 0% (no productivity) to 100% (full productivity). Ethics: Ethical approval was retrospectively granted by the Ryusei Hospital Institutional Review Board (Approval Number 202502). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Interventions

DEVICEGuardner Belt

The Guardner Belt is a commercially available elastic lumbar support belt designed to reduce low-back pain and improve posture. Participants wore the belt sized according to waist circumference for at least 8 hours per day during working hours for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai, Ryusei Hospital.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Full-time desk workers * Chronic nonspecific low-back pain (≥30 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale at baseline) * Age between 20 and 65 years

Exclusion criteria

* • Previous lumbar surgery * Currently receiving pharmacologic treatment for low-back pain * Planned job-duty changes during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low Back Pain Intensity (VAS)Baseline and Week 4Low back pain intensity assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain).
Physical Fatigue During Computer Work (VAS)Baseline and Week 4Physical fatigue during computer work assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (0 mm = no fatigue, 100 mm = extreme fatigue).
Self-rated Work Performance (SPQ)Baseline and Week 4Self-rated work performance assessed using the Single-Item Presenteeism Question (0% = no productivity, 100% = full productivity).

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026