Skip to content

Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants

A Clinical Trial Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway or Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07030270
Acronym
SALTI
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-06-22
Start date
2026-08-05
Completion date
2030-06-01
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Surfactant

Keywords

preterm infants, surfactant therapy, respiratory distress syndrome

Brief summary

What is this study about? This study is comparing two ways of giving surfactant, a medicine that helps premature infants breathe better. Surfactant can be given using a thin tube ("Less Invasive Surfactant Administration", called the LISA method) or through a small airway device placed in the baby's throat above the vocal cords ("Surfactant Administration through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airway", called the SALSA method). The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for preterm infants who are born at 29-36 weeks of pregnancy and have trouble breathing. What is the main question (hypothesis)? Infants who receive surfactant using the SALSA method will have fewer heart rate and breathing-related problems than those who receive it using the LISA method. What are the aims? Aim 1: Are babies in the SALSA group less likely to have low heart rate or low oxygen levels during the procedure compared to babies in the LISA group? Aim 2: Do fewer babies in the SALSA group need to be put on a breathing machine within the first 72 hours of life? Aim 3: Does the SALSA method help reduce the overall time babies need breathing support and lower the cost of their care in the NICU?

Interventions

PROCEDURESurfactant Administration through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airway

Surfactant Administration through Supraglottic Airway Devices -AerVia sizes S, M, L, XL

PROCEDURESurfactant Administration through Thin Catheter

Thin Catheter

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to 72 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All preterm infants born between 29-36 weeks' gestation. * Infants with birthweight greater than or equal to 750 grams and admitted to the NICU on CPAP for respiratory support requiring at least FiO2 25% and qualify for LISA procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Infants who require intubation prior to surfactant therapy * Infants with known severe congenital anomalies (complex congenital heart disease, airway and central nervous system anomalies) * Infants whose birth weight is less than 750 grams or oropharynx unable to accommodate laryngeal mask airways

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined bradycardia (heart rate < 100 for > 10 seconds) and hypoxemia (SpO2 < 80% for > 30 seconds) during surfactant administrationTime of laryngoscope or supraglottic airway device insertion to removal of device* Bradycardia: defined as heart rate \< 100 beats per minute for \> 10 seconds. Heart rate will be obtained from participant's heart rate monitor. * Hypoxemia: oxygen saturation (SpO2) =\< 80% for \> 30 seconds. Oxygen saturation will be obtained from participant's pulse oximeter monitor * Events will be recorded by bedside respiratory therapy and/or bedside nurse during the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural success rate on first attemptAt time of surfactant administration procedure* Procedure attempt is defined at the introduction of laryngoscope blade into mouth for LISA, supraglottic airway for SALSA. * Procedural success is defined by the ability to insert catheter or laryngeal mask airway and administer surfactant with less than 25% of surfactant aspirated from the stomach post administration * Rate will be calculated as a percentage of participants in each arm
Intubation rateFrom time of procedure to 72 hours of life* Rate will be calculated as a percentage of participants in each arm Invasive mechanical ventilation within first 72 hours of life after surfactant * Participants' need for and timing of intubation will be obtained from electronic medical record
Mean number of attempts requiredAt time of surfactant administrationProcedure attempt will be defined as introduction of laryngoscope blade into mouth for LISA and introduction of supraglottic airway into mouth for SALSA.
Total duration of CPAP and mechanical ventilation daysUp to 52 weeksTotal numbers of days on continuous end positive expiratory pressure (CPAP) and invasive mechanical ventilation

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMelody Chiu, M.D.
melody.chiu@utsouthwestern.edu214-648-3903
CONTACTKathryn Mazioniene, R.N.
kathryn.mazioniene@utsouthwestern.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMelody Chiu, M.D.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026