Teeth Requiring Fixed Metal Ceramic Prosthesis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of metal ceramic fixed dental prostheses veneered with two porcelain systems; Vintage Pro and IPS style ceram and cemented with Beautilink SA cement.
Interventions
OTHERfull veneered metal ceramic dental prosthesis cemented with resin cement
full veneered metal ceramic dental prosthesis cemented with resin cement
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age ≥ 21 years 2. Vital or endodontically treated teeth 3. Abutments with no mobility 4. Abutments with adequate crown/root ratio more than 1:1 5. Willing and able to provide written informed consent 6. Ability to attend all follow-up appointments 7. Adequate oral hygiene as determined by the investigator And the following
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with active periodontal disease (probing depth > 4mm, bleeding on probing) 2. Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism confirmed by clinical examination) 3. Poor oral hygiene (plaque index > 30%) 4. Pregnancy or nursing 5. Systemic diseases affecting treatment outcomes (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression) 6. Known allergies to study materials (alloy, ceramic, or resin cement components) 7. Inability to comply with study requirements 8. Current participation in other dental clinical trials 9. Active orthodontic treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wear | 18 months | Measuring device :Digital software (Geomagic) .Measuring Unit :Root mean square |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Restoration Failure | 18 months | Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria.Measuring Unit:Alpha: none Bravo: Discrete crack .Charlie: Chipping.Delta: Bulk fracture |
| Luster of restoration | 18 months | Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria Measuring Unit :Alpha: restoration is shiny has enamel like translucent surface.Bravo: restoration is dull and somewhat opaque .Charlie: restoration surface is distinctly dull and opaque. |
| Color match | 18 months | Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria. Measuring Unit:Alfa: no mismatch in color, shade and translucency between restoration and adjacent teeth Bravo: slight mismatch.Charlie: esthetically unacceptable mismatch |
| Surface texture | 18 months | Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria.Measuring Unit:Alfa: Smooth, glazed or glossy surface.Bravo: Slightly rough surface.Charlie: Very rough surface |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary Contactinas adel mahmoud, lecturer
Outcome results
None listed