Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical performance of laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks pretreated with BeautiBond Xtreme versus HC Primer, using BeautiLink SA cement. The study focuses on marginal adaptation, retention, discoloration, and recurrent caries over 18 months.
Detailed description
This clinical trial compares two bonding protocols for hybrid ceramic laminate veneers. The veneers are fabricated from HC hard blocks and bonded using BeautiLink SA resin cement. One group receives BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment, while the other receives HC Primer. The study assesses marginal adaptation, retention, recurrent caries, and discoloration over 18 months to determine the superior clinical bonding protocol for these restorations.
Interventions
DEVICEBeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation
Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with BeautiBond Xtreme, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were also treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following a standardized clinical protocol.
PROCEDUREHC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation
Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with HC Primer, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following the same clinical protocol used in the experimental grou
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
dult patients ≥ 21 years requiring laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, vital or endodontically treated teeth, sufficient enamel, willing and able to consent and comply. \-
Exclusion criteria
Periodontal disease, bruxism, poor hygiene, pregnancy, systemic illness, allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing trials, orthodontic treatment. \-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Outcome: Marginal Adaptation | Measured at 6, 12, 18 months. | (Modified USPHS) |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary Contactomnia Mohammed Wafik, lecturer
Outcome results
None listed