Skip to content

Proprio Spine Measurement Tool

Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Spine Measurement Tool and Outcomes Assessment From Its Use in Spinal Fusion Surgery

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07023393
Enrollment
0
Registered
2025-06-17
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2029-04-20
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Spinal Curvatures, Spinal Osteochondrosis, Spinal Osteophytosis, Spinal Stenosis, Spondylitis, Spondylosis

Keywords

Spine surgery, Proprio, Spine Measurement, Adults, Posterior Spine Surgery, Spine Fusion, Thoracic Spine Surgery, Lumbar Spine Surgery, Sacral Spine Surgery

Brief summary

This study will prospectively collect data to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement system to assist the surgeon with intraoperatively achieving pre-planned alignment-related parameters to the patient's spine. The study will also collect outcomes data to determine if achievement of these spinal alignment-related parameters result in satisfactory outcomes and if it reduces the rate of secondary surgeries. Objectives Primary: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement system to assist the surgeon with achieving the surgeon's preplanned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively. Secondary: To determine if there is a correlation between 1) achievement of preoperative planned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively, and 2) outcomes. Hypothesis The application of the intraoperative spinal measurement tool for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery will improve the surgeon's ability to achieve pre-planned alignment-related parameters intraoperatively and doing so will provide improved outcomes.

Detailed description

Patient reported outcomes data will be collected on two separate forms- the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF-36. The ODI has been widely used since its development in 1980 and has been viewed as effective for measuring disability in daily living associated with low back pain4. The SF-36 is the most used patient reported outcomes measure used both generically as well as specifically for low back pain, and it consists of both a mental as well as physical assessment5. Study data will be compared to historical literature data. The intraoperative spinal measurement system to be used is the Paradigm TM System by Proprio. Patients will fill out ODI and SF-36 and will have a postoperative standing long x-ray or EOS at regular follow-up intervals (typically 6w, 3m, 6m, 12m, 24m).

Interventions

DEVICEIntraoperative spinal measurement system

The design is a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative spinal measurement tool to assist the surgeon with achieving preoperatively planned alignment-related parameters during surgery.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Proprio Vision, Inc.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 years or older at the time of surgery * Type of Surgery: Consecutively scheduled patients where the measurement system will be used who will have thoracolumbosacral posterior spine surgery that includes spinal instrumentation and fusion and that consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients treated for traumatic injury (penetrating injuries, etc.) * Incarcerated persons * Pregnant females * Any patient current in another trial for a new implant or technique * Non-Spine Related Surgeries: Patients who had surgeries for reasons other than spine-related conditions (even if they incidentally involved the spine) * Patients having additional surgery occurring concurrently with spine surgery * Patients ineligible for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of times the adjustment tool failed to represent the POF within a margin of 3 degreesPre-operative planned state (enrollment), Postoperative final state (12 months)Effectiveness of the intraoperative spinal measurement tool will be assessed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Outcomes as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Enrollment to 24 months post-operativelyThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measures disability in daily living associated with low back pain. The total score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability.
Patient Reported Outcomes as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)Enrollment to 24 months post-operativelyThe SF-36 measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, each scored 0-100 (higher = better health). Two summary scores-Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)-are derived.
Number of secondary surgeriesEnrollment to 24 months post-operativelyNumber of secondary surgeries will be collected through the electronic health record and from the patient to capture any surgery performed outside Duke.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBrett Rocos, MD

Duke University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026