Skip to content

PENG With LFCB vs. ESP Blocks for Pediatric Hip Surgery

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCB) Versus Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07023094
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-15
Start date
2025-06-16
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Arthropathy, Hip Disease, Hip Dysplasia

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compares the analgesic effectiveness of two regional anesthesia techniques-Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCB) versus Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB)-in pediatric patients undergoing hip surgery.

Detailed description

Orthopedic hip procedures in pediatric patients, including osteotomies, arthroscopic interventions, and reconstructive surgeries, often result in significant postoperative pain. Effective analgesia is critical for reducing surgical stress, accelerating rehabilitation, and minimizing opioid use and associated side effects. Regional anesthesia techniques have gained attention for their opioid-sparing effects and enhanced recovery profiles. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of two regional anesthetic approaches: \- The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is combined with the lateral fetal cutaneous nerve block (LFCB), targeting hip joint innervation directly and providing comprehensive sensory coverage. Lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB) employ fascial plane techniques to deliver analgesia by diffusing local anesthetic around nerves innervating the hip region. This trial aims to establish the optimal regional anesthesia technique and determine the clinical benefits of using dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants. The results will guide clinicians toward evidence-based analgesic protocols in pediatric orthopedic hip surgery, potentially reducing opioid-related complications and improving patient recovery outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for PENG Block

U-S guided PENG (0.4 mL/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for LFCB

LFCB (0.1 mL/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for L-ESPB

Lumbar ESPB (0.25ml/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for S-ESPB

Sacral ESPB (0.25ml/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients aged between 2 and 16 years. * Scheduled for elective orthopedic hip surgery, including: Osteotomies and Hip reconstruction surgeries * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification: I-III. * Written informed consent obtained from the patient's legal guardian(s).

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study medications * Presence of infection or inflammation at the intended injection site(s) of regional anesthesia. * Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders (including patients on anticoagulant therapy) that contraindicate nerve blocks. * Neurological disorders or peripheral neuropathies that could influence sensory or motor assessment of the lower limbs. * Cognitive impairment or behavioral disorders significantly affecting pain assessment accuracy or cooperation. * History of chronic opioid use or known substance abuse. * Severe systemic disease or condition compromising patient safety or interfering with study protocol adherence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Opioid Consumption48 hours after surgeryTotal opiate consumption after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first rescue opioid analgesia48 hours after surgeryTime after surgery when the patient needs opiate for the first time
Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]4 hours after surgeryPostoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
NLR12 hours after surgeryneutrophile to lymphocyte ratio
PLR12 hours after surgeryplatelet to lymphocyte ratio

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactMalgorzata Reysner
mreysner@ump.edu.pl+48 61 873 83 03

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026