Mastectomy Patient
Conditions
Keywords
Mastectomy, Analgesia, erector spinae plane block, tizanidine
Brief summary
Effective management of postoperative pain in breast cancer surgery is essential to minimize the risk of developing postmastectomy pain syndrome.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining bilevel erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a single preoperative oral dose of tizanidine in improving postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. It is hypothesized that the combination of bilevel ESP block and single-dose oral tizanidine will provide superior postoperative analgesia compared to bilevel ESP block alone in patients undergoing mastectomy.
Detailed description
Introduction: Effective management of postoperative pain in breast cancer surgery is essential to minimize the risk of developing postmastectomy pain syndrome, a chronic condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Multimodal analgesia, which combines pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, has been shown to enhance postoperative pain control and reduce opioid consumption. In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques have become increasingly favored for perioperative pain management in breast surgeries. The ESP block has gained popularity due to its simplicity, safety profile, and effectiveness in thoracic and breast surgeries. Its analgesic action is attributed to the craniocaudal spread of local anesthetic into the costovertebral foramina and epidural space, resulting in blockade of both ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves and providing unilateral thoracic analgesia.The bilevel ESP block, which involves administering the block at two distinct thoracic levels, has been proposed to enhance the spread of local anesthetic and improve analgesic coverage, particularly in the anterolateral chest wall and axillary regions commonly involved in mastectomy. Tizanidine has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid and anesthetic requirements, stabilize hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation, and minimize postoperative complications such as shivering and myocardial ischemia. Previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain across a variety of surgical procedures, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy, thyroidectomy, anorectal surgery, hernia repair, and orthognathic surgery.Given the potential synergistic effects of combining regional anesthesia with systemic analgesics, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combining bilevel ESPB with a single oral dose of tizanidine for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing mastectomy. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining bilevel erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a single preoperative oral dose of tizanidine in improving postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. Sample Size Calculation: Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 3.1.9.2 for windows (2017). The primary outcome will be time to first analgesic request. In a pilot study performed on 10 patients using bilevel ESP block, the mean (SD) of time to first analgesic request was 21 (6.5) hours. Using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05, assuming alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.2 (power = 80%) and using a two-sided two-sample unequal-variance t-test, 39 subjects will be required in each group to detect 20 % difference between groups which is considered the minimal clinically important difference. To allow for subject dropouts, 45 subjects will be assigned to each group. Methods; The study will be conducted in Mansoura oncology centre on 90 patients who will be scheduled for mastectomy surgery under general anesthesia. Informed written consent will be obtained from all subjects in the study after ensuring confidentiality. 90 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to 2 equal groups (Bilevel ESP block group) and (Bilevel ESP block+ tizanidine group) according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes which will be opened only after obtaining the written informed consent. The study protocol will be explained to all patients along with VAS after enrollment into the study. They will be kept fasting according to pre-operative ASA recommendations prior to surgery. Basic demographic characters including age, gender, and BMI will be recorded. The peri-operative management will be identical in both groups. All patients with planned modified radical mastectomy will be assessed preoperatively by detailed medical history taking, clinical examination, Electrocardiography (ECG), and basal laboratory investigations as complete blood count (CBC), coagulation profile (PT, INR), blood glucose level, liver and renal function tests (liver enzymes, serum bilirubin, albumin and serum creatinine). Statistical Methods: The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using SPSS program (version 22) for Windows. Normality of numerical data distribution will be tested by Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous data of normal distribution will be presented as mean ± SD and will be compared with the unpaired student's t test. Non-normally distributed data will be presented as median (range) and will be compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data will be presented as number (percentage) and will be compared with the Chi-square test. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.
Interventions
Block will be performed unilaterally with the patient in the sitting position leaning forward. The block will be done using a high frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz). The block area will be adequately sterilized and draped, then the ultrasound probe will be placed 2-3 cm laterally from the midline at the level of the T3 spinous process using a sagittal approach to identify the hyperechoic transverse process shadow deep to the trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles. Then, the needle will be inserted craniocaudally in-plane to reach the transverse process deep to the erector spinae muscle. Correct positioning of the needle will be confirmed through real-time visualization of 2-mL saline hydro dissection. After confirmation of needle position, 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected at each level. The same procedure was repeated for the second level T5 spinous process. block failure defined as the presence of full sensation after 30 minutes, patients will be excluded .
One hour prior to anesthesia induction, the patients will recieve oral placebo capsule that will have the same color, smell, and size as tizanidine.
One hour prior to anesthesia induction, the tizanidine group will receive a 4 mg tizanidine oral capsule.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
A single investigator will assess the patients for eligibility, obtain written informed consent, open the sealed opaque envelopes containing group allocation, prepare all injections and oral medication needed for the study. Another investigator blinded to the study group will give oral drug and perform block. In addition, the study subjects and the resident assessing the outcome will be blinded to the study group.
Intervention model description
Prospective, randomized, double blind study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) ІІ patients. 2. Scheduled for unilateral modified radical mastectomy. 3. BMI levels between 18.5- 35 Kg/m2.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient's refusal. 2. Altered mental status or un-cooperative patients. 3. History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics. 4. Bleeding or coagulation diathesis. 5. Infection or redness at the injection site. 6. Cardiac, renal, hepatic, hematological disease, peptic ulcer, gastrointestinal bleeding, and central or peripheral neurological disease. 7. Chronic pain. 8. Participants used analgesics routinely within the last 24 h.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| First analgesic request | Up to 24 hours after the procedure. | The time of the first analgesic request for fentanyl will be recorded. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain assessment | Up to 24 hours after the procedure | VAS score from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = the worst imaginable pain) will be assessed before the procedure, and then at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h post operative. |
| Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl | Up to 24 hours after the procedure | The amount of fentanyl consumption given as a rescue analgesia to patients will be measured all over the 24 hours. |
| Heart rate (HR) | Up to the end of the procedure | HR will be recorded before the procedure, after 15 min, 30 minutes and then every 30min intraoperative till the end of surgery. |
| Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) | Up to the end of the procedure | MAP will be recorded before the procedure, after 15 min, 30 minutes and then every 30min intraoperative till the end of surgery. |
| Adverse effects | Up to 24 hours after the procedure] | respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, hematoma or allergic reactions will be recorded |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University