Skip to content

Impact of Dietary Knowledge Related to Functional Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes on the Risk of Eating Disorders

Impact of Dietary Knowledge Related to Functional Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes on the Risk of Eating Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07021456
Acronym
DIABEA
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-15
Start date
2025-04-14
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Keywords

eating disorders, functional insulin therapy, type 1 diabetes, dietary knowledge

Brief summary

Background: The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) relies on exogenous insulin administration to compensate for the lack of endogenous insulin production. Optimal glycemic control, essential for preventing long-term complications, requires precise insulin dose adjustments based on carbohydrate intake. Functional insulin therapy (FIT) allows for flexibility in insulin dosing according to carbohydrate consumption, thereby reducing the dietary constraints previously imposed on patients. However, this approach requires increased attention to dietary intake. Individuals with T1D already have a heightened risk of developing eating disorders (EDs). We hypothesize that the dietary knowledge required for FIT may contribute to rigid eating behaviors, thereby increasing the risk of EDs. Objective: This prospective monocentric study aims to determine whether dietary knowledge related to FIT is associated with an increased risk of EDs in individuals with T1D. Methods: The primary outcome measure is the correlation between the Gluciquizz score (a validated tool assessing FIT knowledge) and the risk of EDs, evaluated using the DEPS-R questionnaire (a validated screening tool for ED risk in T1D patients). In addition to this quantitative analysis, a qualitative study will be conducted through semi-structured interviews to explore in greater depth the patients' experiences, their relationship with food, and their perceptions of FIT-related requirements. Perspectives: This study aims to improve the understanding of the impact of FIT on ED risk in T1D. The findings may help identify at-risk patient profiles and enhance therapeutic education and patient management by integrating ED risk considerations. The qualitative approach will provide further insight into patients' individual experiences, facilitating recommendations tailored to their specific needs.

Detailed description

STUDY DESCRIPTION This is a Type 3 study under the Jardé law, involving human subjects: Observational study Prospective design Monocentric National scope We selected this study design to minimize participant burden (data collection conducted online, by phone, or via videoconference, eliminating the need for patient travel). Recruitment through patient association websites and social media will enable a national reach. The study will take place in four phases: Recruitment Videoconference for a questionnaire on FIT-related dietary knowledge and ED risk assessment Self-administered online questionnaire Videoconference interview SELECTION AND INCLUSION VISIT If the participant wishes to join the study, they can either scan the QR code or visit the web link provided in the recruitment announcement. This QR code or link will redirect to a page detailing the study, the eligibility criteria that the participant must complete, and the information notice. The participant will enter their email address in the designated field and will also have the option to download the information notice if they wish. Once this step is completed, the principal investigator will verify the eligibility criteria. If the participant meets the criteria, they will receive an email containing the necessary information for the next steps of the study: Non-opposition letter - Part 1 A personal identifier number (formatted as initials + number, e.g., LA01) to pseudonymize questionnaire and self-reported responses A calendar allowing them to indicate their preferred date for the videoconference A link to access the videoconference To ensure that the participant fully understands the study procedures, the clinical research associate (CRA) will go over the project details during the first videoconference and address any questions. The CRA will also check that the non-opposition form has been properly completed before integrating it into the study records. If the participant does not meet the eligibility criteria, they will receive an email notifying them of their ineligibility. The principal investigator will maintain a correspondence table containing the participant's name, surname, email address, and personal identifier number. Participants will be fully and transparently informed in clear and understandable terms about the study objectives, the nature of the collected data, and their right to withdraw their consent at any time. The investigator must also inform participants about the opinion issued by the Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes - CPP). Participants can exercise their right to oppose the processing of their health data for research purposes at any time by contacting either the research coordinator or the institution responsible for the data. The institution is committed to responding to such requests within a maximum of two months. FOLLOW-UP VISITS The study will be conducted in three distinct phases: 1. First Phase: Videoconference for Questionnaire Completion A clinical research associate (CRA) will contact the participant to administer the questionnaires. The CRA will directly enter the participant's responses into the Redcap online platform. At the end of this interview, the investigator will invite participants to take part in the qualitative phase of the study (third phase: semi-structured videoconference interview). Participants will be progressively included until data saturation is reached. If the participant agrees, the investigator will send a second email with a second non-opposition form - Part 2 (Appendix 4) for participation in the qualitative interview. For all participants, a Redcap platform link will be emailed to them to complete the self-reported questionnaires. 2. Second Phase: Online Self-Questionnaires Participants will receive a link to complete self-administered questionnaires directly on Redcap. Contact information for the CRA or investigator will be provided in case of technical issues. 3. Third Phase: Semi-Structured Videoconference Interview This interview will be semi-structured and will follow the interview guide provided in Appendix 12. Participants will be included in this phase until data saturation is reached. For the first and third phases, we have chosen to conduct interviews via the BigBlueButton videoconferencing platform, which is GDPR-compliant. We aim to use a platform that is user-friendly and free for participants. Since BigBlueButton is integrated with the Université Grenoble Alpes information system, no additional identification data will be processed. The following personal data-voice and image-will be recorded by the interview organizer. If the recording feature is activated, participants will be explicitly notified via a specific message. The recordings will be used exclusively for the transcription of data.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes confirmed by a referring physician * Diagnosis received at least three months prior * Adult (18 years or older) * Access to a computer or smartphone capable of videoconferencing * No expressed opposition to participation * Consent for image rights (for Phase 2 qualitative interviews)

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to complete online questionnaires and participate in a 45-minute videoconference interview * Being under legal guardianship or curatorship * Being pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
to determine whether dietary knowledge related to functional insulin therapy (FIT) is associated with the risk of developing eating disorders (EDs)Day 1the correlation between the Gluciquizz score (a validated tool assessing FIT knowledge) and the risk of EDs, as measured by the DEPS-R questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess whether the following factors influence the risk of developing EDs: a. Quality of lifeDay 1Comparison of the following factors: quality of life (measured by ADDQoL, unit: individual weighted impact score) between two groups defined by the DEPS-R threshold (≤ 20 vs. \> 20, indicating ED risk).
To identify whether specific patient profiles at risk of developing EDs emerge based on the collected variables.Day 1Identification of patient profiles based on the following variables: FIT knowledge (Gluciquizz, unit: percentage of correct responses), quality of life (ADDQoL, unit: individual weighted impact score), diabetes-related anxiety (PAID, unit: total score ranging from 0 to 100), fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II, unit: total score ranging from 0 to 33 for the behavior subscale and 0 to 45 for the worry subscale), diabetes duration (unit: years), and treatment (unit: type of treatment, e.g., insulin therapy, oral antidiabetic drugs), with DEPS-R (unit: total score ranging from 0 to 30) as an illustrative variable.
To determine whether dietary knowledge related to FIT is associated with the risk of EDs according to the SCOFF-F questionnaire (a validated French screening tool for EDs).Day 1Correlation between the Gluciquizz score (validated for assessing FIT knowledge) and the risk of EDs according to the SCOFF-F questionnaire.
To assess whether the following factors influence the risk of developing EDs: b. Diabetes-related anxietyDay 1Comparison of the following factors: diabetes-related anxiety (PAID, unit: total score ranging from 0 to 100) between two groups defined by the DEPS-R threshold (≤ 20 vs. \> 20, indicating ED risk).
To assess whether the following factors influence the risk of developing EDs: c. fear of hypoglycemiaDay 1Comparison of the following factors: fear of hypoglycemia (HFS, unit: total score ranging from 0 to 8) between two groups defined by the DEPS-R threshold (≤ 20 vs. \> 20, indicating ED risk).
To explore the influence of functional insulin therapy on eating behaviors through semi-structured interviews.Day 1Insights into the decision-making factors influencing food choices among individuals with type 1 diabetes, following qualitative study methodologies.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactCécile BERTY
CBetry@chu-grenoble.fr0476765509
Backup ContactLaura ALBALADEJO
LAlbaladejo@chu-grenoble.fr0476765509

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026