Skip to content

Wai Ji Match Fun Card Games for People With Intellectual Disabilities

Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of Wai Ji Match Fun Card Games on Cognitive Performance and Psychosocial Wellbeing for People With Intellectual Disabilities

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07019584
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-13
Start date
2024-07-11
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adults With Intellectual Disability

Keywords

Card game, intellectual disability, cognition, psychosocial wellbeing, feasibility and acceptability

Brief summary

A new set of card game, Wai Ji Match Fun (WJMF), has been developed by Wai Ji Christian Service (WJCS), a non-governmental organization in Hong Kong, specifically designed for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). The game aims to enhance cognitive performance and psychosocial well-being while facilitating daily participation.

Detailed description

This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of WJMF for individuals with ID, and its immediate and carry-over impacts on psychosocial well-being and cognitive function. Sixty-four adult participants with mild to moderate ID were recruited for the study. Each participant attends a weekly 60-minute WJMF group program over an 8-week period. Groups of four participants are facilitated by occupational therapists or rehabilitation assistants. Outcome measures include the Personal Wellbeing Index - Intellectual Disability (PWI-ID) (Chinese-Cantonese version), the short version of the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT), attendance rates, and staff feedback on feasibility and acceptability.

Interventions

OTHERWai Ji Match Fun card games

Group intervention using game activities with Wai Ji Match Fun cards. A total of eight group sessions, which last for 60 minutes each, will be conducted once a week for a period of 8 weeks.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

one-group repeated-measures design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* service users attending residential or day training service units * aged 18 years or older * diagnosed with mild or moderate intellectual disability * able to engage in a 60-minute group session

Exclusion criteria

\- exhibit disruptive behaviours that could hinder group progress

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility by measuring the attendance rateFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksFeasibility by measuring the attendance rate.
Staff acceptabilityend of the treatment at 8 weeksAcceptability survey collecting staff feedback with questions from 0 (completely disagree) to 10 (completely agree)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Personal Wellbeing Index - Intellectual Disability (PWI-ID) (Chinese - Cantonese version) (Cummins & Lau, 2005)Enrollment, one week after the end of treatment, seven weeks after the end of treatmentAn 8-item scale measuring 7 domains in quality of life through interviews. The 8 scales include standard of living, health, life achievement, personal relationships, personal safety, community-connectedness, and future security. Participants rate their well-being using a scale tailored to their abilities: a 0-10-point scale or a system utilising 2, 3, or 5 facial expressions to indicate levels of sadness to happiness.
Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) short version (Tyrer et al., 2010)Enrollment, one week after the end of treatment, seven weeks after the end of treatmentA structured interview that has been developed to assess cognitive function in subjects with intellectual disability (Kay et al., 2003). The short version of PCFT consists of six sub-domains: orientation, recall-I, language, praxis, recall-II and calculation (Tyrer et al., 2010), totalling 21 questions. The maximum score for the test is 30.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026