Skip to content

Intrapatient Comparison of STN and GPi tTIS in PD

Intrapatient Comparison of Subthalamic and Globus Pallidus Internus Temporal Interference Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07018388
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-12
Start date
2025-04-23
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

subthalamic nucleus, Globus Pallidus Internus, transcranial temporal interference stimulation

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of tTIS in patients with Parkinson's disease and to evaluate the immediate effects and conduct intrapatient comparisons of individualized 130 Hz Subthalamic Nucleus-transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (STN-tTIS) and Globus Pallidus Internus-transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (GPi-tTIS) on motor symptoms in patients with early to mid-stage Parkinson's Disease (PD) during "off" medication states. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Can tTIS significantly improve the motor symptoms of patients with Parkinson's disease? 2. Is the therapeutic effect of STN-tTIS superior to that of GPi-tTIS?

Detailed description

This clinical trial aims to verify the efficacy of tTIS in patients with Parkinson's disease and to explore which targets are better for improving PD motor symptoms.Patients were randomly assigned to receive Stimulation Type A, B, or C. Type A received STN-tTIS therapy; Type B received GPi-tTIS therapy; Type C received sham stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus. Each session lasted 20 minutes, and patients were in the off-medication state for all treatments.The order of stimulation types was randomized, with at least 7 days of washout between sessions to avoid carryover effects. MDS-UPDRS-III evaluations were assessed before and after each treatment.

Interventions

To design the individualized STN-tTIS, each patient completes a T1-weighted anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The individual's structural brain MRI data are used to determine the STN-tTIS montage and stimulation settings through computational modeling.

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary Parkinson's disease (MDS); * Hoehn \& Yahr stage ≤ 3; * Antiparkinsonian drugs must have remained unchanged in the past four weeks, and the dosage must have remained stable throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of neurological disorders that may affect the study (e.g., traumatic brain injury); * Antipsychotics, antidepressants, or dopamine modulators outside of PD drugs; * Metal devices in the head or heart (e.g., deep brain stimulators, pacemakers); * Unstable vital signs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MDS-UPDRS-Ⅲ scorespre-intervention, immediately after the interventionThe score range for MDS-UPDRS-III is from 0 to 132. The minimum value is 0, indicating no motor impairment, and the maximum value is 132, indicating the most severe motor impairment. Higher scores on the MDS-UPDRS-III indicate worse outcomes, as they reflect greater severity of motor symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MDS-UPDRS-Ⅲ sub-scorespre-intervention, immediately after the interventionThe MDS-UPDRS-III assesses motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease through sub-scores: Tremor Sub-score: Items 15-18; range 0-16. Higher scores indicate more severe tremors. Rigidity Sub-score: Item 3; range 0-12. Higher scores reflect greater rigidity. Bradykinesia Sub-score: Items 2, 4-9, and 14; range 0-40. Higher scores indicate more severe slowness of movement. Axial Sub-score: Items 1 and 9-13; range 0-24. Higher scores suggest more significant axial impairments.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026