Skip to content

Gender Differences in Musculoskeletal Assessment Methods in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain

Gender Differences in Musculoskeletal Assessment Methods in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07018154
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-06-12
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2025-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic, Gender Differences, Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Assessment

Brief summary

This study is an observational test-retest study designed to investigate the effect of gender on core strength, balance, spinal mobility, and hamstring flexibility in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NS-LBP).

Detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is the primary contributor to years of disability. Individual features (age, physical fitness), psychosocial factors (stress, anxiety, and depression), and occupational factors (hard physical work, bending and twisting motions, and vibration) have all been linked to the development of LBP, which is thought to have a complex etiology.

Interventions

Patients underwent a musculoskeletal Assessment.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both sexes will be involved. * Patients suffer from chronic NS-LBP for more than 3 months. * Patients' age ranges from 18 to 40 years, and body mass index ranges from 18 to 25 kg/m2. * Patients with sufficient cognitive abilities that enable them to understand and follow instructions.

Exclusion criteria

* History of spinal trauma or fractures. * Osteoporotic patients. * Patients using analgesics during the last 3 months. * Pregnant or lactating females. * Neurological musculoskeletal diseases that affect the lower back (eg, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, disc injuries). * Previous spinal surgery. * Posture deformities. * Cauda equina symptoms related to the spine, including changes in bowel and bladder control. * Signs of severe pathology (eg, malignancy, inflammatory disorders). * Patients with severe psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core strength6 months post-procedureMeasurement of core strength was done with the patient in the crooked lying position. Then, the cuff of the device was held under the lower back of the patient, and the patient was instructed to press against this cuff, tuck his abdomen, and hold the contraction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Balance control6 months post-procedureRomberg's test was used to assess static balance control. Each patient was tested in a single-leg stance with their eyes open on both a stable surface and then on an unstable surface. For the starting position, each patient stands on their dominant leg (determined by the football kicking test), with the unsupported leg in a neutral hip and 90-degree knee flexion position, and their arms crossed at chest level; the examiner observes this position for 60 seconds. In each test condition (SS and SUS), each patient was asked to maintain the position, and the duration for which they held the position was recorded.
Spinal mobility6 months post-procedureThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to measure lumbar flexion and extension range of motion. The measurements were taken in a neutral standing position. A line connecting the two posterior superior iliac spines was drawn. Then, two points in the middle of the line and 15 cm above were marked. With lumbar flexion or extension, the distance between the two points was measured and subtracted from the 15 cm distance
Hamstring flexibility6 months post-procedureTo begin the hamstring flexibility test, the patient sits on the floor with both feet straight forward against a box. Both knees were pressed down to the floor. With the palms facing downwards, and the hands side by side, the subject stretched forward four times and held the position of maximum reach on the fourth count. The patient was asked to maintain the position for two counts. The most distant line touched by the fingertips of both hands was noted, and the distance was measured in cm.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026