Skip to content

The Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effectiveness of the Sacral Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07017400
Acronym
sacral ESP
Enrollment
126
Registered
2025-06-12
Start date
2025-07-16
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Anthroplasty, Regional Anesthesia

Keywords

regional anesthesia, total knee arthroplasty

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the analgesic efficacy and postoperative recovery of two locoregional anesthesia combinations in patients \> 18 years (ASA I-III), scheduled for unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours: * ACB + sacral ESP block * ACB + iPACK block The main question it aims to answer is: Does the ACB + sacral ESP block combination produce effective postoperative recovery and analgesic effect? Participants already taking ACB + sacral ESP block as part of their regular peri-operative care for TKA will be followed in the postoperative period for 48 hours.

Detailed description

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic surgery in elderly patients, often requiring effective postoperative pain control to enhance recovery. Conventional locoregional techniques include adductor canal block (ACB) and the iPACK block (infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee). While effective, iPACK may carry infection risks due to its proximity to the surgical field. The sacral ESP block is a more recent ultrasound-guided technique targeting posterior sacral nerve branches from a remote site, potentially avoiding motor weakness and surgical site complications. Early literature and local clinical experience suggest that combining sacral ESP with ACB may provide comparable analgesia to ACB+iPACK while offering practical and safety advantages. Study Design: * Type: Single-center, prospective, observational study * Setting: Ospedale di Crotone, Italy * Duration: Maximum of 30 months * Sample size: 63 patients per group (based on QoR-15 score, with 80% power and α = 0.05) Population: * Adults \>18 years (ASA I-III), scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \>24 hours * Exclusion: refusal of consent, contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia, coagulation disorders, severe dementia, ongoing infection, or emergency surgeries Primary Endpoint: * Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score at 24 hours post-surgery (score range 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery) Secondary Endpoints: * Postoperative pain scores (NRS, score range 0-10, higher scores indicate more pain) at rest and movement (0-48 hours) * Time to first mobilization * Patient satisfaction (Likert scale) * Analgesic consumption and time to first request * Incidence of nausea, vomiting, antiemetic use * Block-related complications or adverse events Procedure: All patients receive spinal anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia (paracetamol, rescue tramadol). Regional blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance in aseptic conditions. ESP is performed at the S2 level with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375%. ACB and iPACK are also administered per standard protocols. Data Analysis: Statistical comparisons between groups will be made using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests based on variable distribution. Repeated measures will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Ethics: The study follows Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients provide written informed consent. Privacy and data confidentiality are ensured.

Interventions

combination of regional blocks for TKA postoperative analgesia

Sponsors

San Giovanni di Dio Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults \>18 years * ASA I-III * scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of consent * Local anesthetics allergies * contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia * coagulation disorders * anticoagulation/antiaggregation medications * dementia * ASA-PS \> III * ongoing infection * emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score at 24 hours post-surgeryat 24 hours post-surgeryQuality of Recovery (QoR-15) - score range 0-150 - higher scores indicate better recovery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain scores (NRS) at rest and movement (0-48 hours)0-48 hours from surgeryNRS at rest and movement - score range 0 (no pain) - 10 (the worst pain)
Time to first mobilization0-48 hoursfirst patient mobilization - time (hour) of first mobilization
Analgesic consumption (total drug dosage)0-48 hoursEffectiveness of the blocks
Time to first analgesic request (time - hour - of first request)0-48 hoursDuration of the blocks

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactTommaso Sorrentino, Anesthesiology
tommaso.sorrentino@asp.crotone.it+393277038017

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026