Skip to content

The Added Value of Three-dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping For Accurate Delivery Of Pulsed Field Ablation In The Pulmonary Veins Compared To Pulsed Field Ablation With Fluoroscopy And/Or Intracardiac Echocardiography Alone In The Treatment Of Atrial Fibrillation: MAP-PFA Study

The Added Value of Three-dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping For Accurate Delivery Of Pulsed Field Ablation In The Pulmonary Veins Compared To Pulsed Field Ablation With Fluoroscopy And/Or Intracardiac Echocardiography Alone In The Treatment Of Atrial Fibrillation: MAP-PFA Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07014423
Acronym
MAP-PFA
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-06-11
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
2026-01-20
Last updated
2026-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Keywords

Electroanatomical mapping, Pulsed Field Ablation, Atrial Fibrillation, The FARAPULSE system, FARAWAVE catheter, FARAVIEW mapping software, Pulmonary vein isolation, Fluoroscopy, Intracardiac Echocardiography, High density mapping, Eccentricity Index

Brief summary

This is a randomized control trial that aims to evaluate the added value of electro-anatomical mapping to improve the quality of pulse field ablation lesions during Atrial fibrillation ablation.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center randomized control trial, aims to compare the symmetry and centricity of pulmonary veins antral ablation lesions during positioning the ablation catheter with versus without the use of the FARAVIEW mapping system. The trial will enroll patients with atrial fibrillation, who are planned to undergo atrial fibrillation pulsed field ablation ablation using FARAWAVE catheter (the standard ablation catheter without FARAVIEW mapping software utilization) and FARAVIEW catheter (the upgraded catheter with features to utilize the FARVIEW mapping software) during the period of 2025. A total of 32 patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either group of the trial. The aim is to enroll 16 patients from each participating institution (i.e. UMCG and Erasmus UMC). All study candidates will be either assigned to FARAVIEW (Group 1) or FARAWAVE (Group 2). Both groups will undergo post ablation high density intracardiac mapping (e.g. voltage mapping) with the ORION mapping catheter, to assess the symmetry and centrality of the antral pulmonary veins' ablation lesions in relation to the pulmonary vein ostia. We propose an Eccentricity Index to compare and reflect the central location of the pulmonary veins' antral ablation lesions' margins relative to the pulmonary veins' ostia between the two groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe Pulsed Field Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Vein with the utilization of FARAVIEW mapping software.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with the additional use of the FARAVIEW mapping system (The additional mapping approach)

PROCEDUREThe Pulsed Field Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Vein without the utilization of FARAVIEW mapping software.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation without the use of the FARAVIEW mapping system.

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is investigator-initiated, prospective, international, multicenter randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation. * Planned for ablation with Pulsed Field ablation technology. * Able to consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

-History of prior Atrial Fibrillation ablation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Eccentricity Index of the pulmonary veins' antral ablation lesions in both study groups.Procedure Day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The number of additional "touch-up" ablations needed according to the operator in both study groups after the initial ablation was concluded and post ablation map was performed.Procedure Day

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRYuri Blaauw, MD, PhD

University Medical Center Groningen

STUDY_DIRECTORSing-Chien Yap, MD, PhD

Erasmus Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 21, 2026