Skip to content

Single-use Versus Multiple-use Endoscopes in Gastroenterology

Single-use Versus Multiple-use Endoscopes in Gastroenterology: Multi Methods Analysis to Balancing Infection Control and Environmental Impact

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07014033
Acronym
SUMU-Endo
Enrollment
39
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2024-10-16
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

Brief summary

Gastroenterology is a branch of medicine that looks after people with problems in the gut (including the stomach and bowels) using an endoscope. An endoscope is a thin tube with a light and camera at the end, which is used to look inside bits of the body, for example the stomach, bile ducts (tubes that connect the liver and gallbladder to the bowel) or large bowel. Some have extra bits attached to take samples of tissue to look at under a microscope. These tubes are made mostly of plastic. Around 1.5 million endoscopies are performed each year in the UK. In the NHS, most endoscopes are re-usable and are used hundreds of times after cleaning and disinfection. They must be very carefully cleaned and disinfected to reduce the risk of passing on infections to other patients as well as the healthcare staff who use the equipment. If endoscopes are cleaned and disinfected properly, the risk of infection will be very low. However there have been reports of infections, which may be related to disinfection not being done properly. Disposable single-use endoscopes are now available, designed to reduce the risk of infection. These are thought to be just as good as re-usable endoscopes. However, if we switch to disposable endoscopes, it may increase the cost to the NHS. There will also be an effect on the environment from using limited resources to make endoscopes, and get rid of them by incineration (burning) or burial in landfill waste. The aim of this research is to provide evidence on the arguments for and against the use of single-use vs. multiple-use endoscopes in gastroenterology for NHS decision makers, especially regarding cost-effectiveness and effect on the environment. This will help the aim of the NHS in England to be "the world's first 'net zero' national health service.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients * Over the age of 18 * Patient has been invited to an NHS endoscopic clinic to undertake an upper GI endoscope procedure, including diagnostic endoscopies and the less complex therapeutic endoscopy. * Patient is able to read and understand information provided * Patient has capacity to provide consent * Patient is able to participate in an interview. Staff * Over the age of 18 * Employed by the NHS * Working in relevant endoscopy unit - primary work involves the conduct of endoscopy and/or waste disposal services (decontamination or disposal).

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has received a lower GI endoscopy, e.g. colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy * Non-NHS service providers and receivers. (e.g., private diagnostic clinics)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative Interview Study8 monthsNumber of participants recruited to interview

Countries

United Kingdom

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Any other ethnic background
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Asian British
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 16, 2026