Skip to content

The Impact of ERA Switching on Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

ACTION - The Impact of ERA Switching on Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07013149
Acronym
ACTION
Enrollment
183
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2025-08-20
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (WHO Group 1 PH)

Keywords

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, PAH, Endothelin Receptor Antagonists, ERA, Ambrisentan, Bosentan, Drug Switching, Risk Stratification

Brief summary

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive, and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and right ventricular dysfunction. The endothelin pathway plays a central role in its pathophysiology and is targeted by endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), including ambrisentan and bosentan. Ambrisentan is a selective ETA receptor antagonist, whereas bosentan blocks both ETA and ETB receptors. Although transitions between ERAs occur in clinical practice, evidence regarding the clinical impact of switching from ambrisentan to bosentan remains limited. ACTION is a retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study evaluating adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (World Health Organization Group 1) and/or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (World Health Organization Group 4) confirmed by right heart catheterization. Patients who switched from ambrisentan to bosentan because of a national ambrisentan shortage will be compared with clinically similar patients who remained on ambrisentan. Clinical, functional, and laboratory data recorded at baseline and at 3 to 6 months of follow-up will be assessed. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with worsening risk stratification after switching from ambrisentan to bosentan compared with patients who continued ambrisentan. Risk will be evaluated using the COMPERA 2.0 and REVEAL Lite 2 assessment tools. Secondary outcomes include changes in World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, BNP levels, individual risk-assessment components, hepatic enzymes, hemoglobin levels, and clinically relevant events such as hospitalization, emergency department visits, initiation of supplemental oxygen, and right heart failure decompensation.

Detailed description

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular dysfunction, and premature mortality. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a distinct form of precapillary pulmonary hypertension classified as World Health Organization Group 4. In selected patients with PAH or inoperable or residual CTEPH, therapies targeting the endothelin pathway may be used as part of clinical management. Endothelin-1 contributes to pulmonary vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling through ETA and ETB receptors. Endothelin receptor antagonists are an established component of PAH treatment. Ambrisentan selectively antagonizes the ETA receptor and is administered once daily, whereas bosentan is a dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonist that requires regular monitoring because of its potential hepatic and hematologic adverse effects. Transitions between medications within the ERA class may occur because of adverse events, clinical considerations, patient-related factors, or medication availability. However, evidence regarding the clinical consequences of switching from ambrisentan to bosentan is limited, particularly when the transition is imposed by an external disruption in medication supply rather than planned as an elective therapeutic strategy. The ACTION study is a retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study designed to assess the real-world clinical impact of switching from ambrisentan to bosentan. The study includes adults aged 18 years or older with PAH or CTEPH confirmed by right heart catheterization. Two exposure groups will be evaluated: patients who transitioned from ambrisentan 10 mg to bosentan 125 mg following a national shortage of ambrisentan and patients with a similar clinical profile who remained on ambrisentan. Baseline data will correspond to the clinical assessment performed at or near the time of the medication transition in the switch group and to a comparable reference assessment in the maintenance group. Follow-up data recorded 3 to 6 months later will be used to evaluate changes within each group and differences between groups. The primary outcome is worsening of risk stratification after the medication transition, comparing patients who switched to bosentan with patients who remained on ambrisentan. Risk will be assessed using COMPERA 2.0 and REVEAL Lite 2. Analyses will include between-group comparisons and within-group comparisons of risk categories and their individual components. Secondary outcomes include changes in World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, BNP levels, hepatic transaminases, and hemoglobin. The study will also evaluate clinically relevant events, including hospitalization, emergency department visits, initiation of supplemental oxygen, and decompensation of right heart failure. By including a contemporaneous maintenance group, the ACTION study seeks to distinguish changes potentially associated with the medication switch from changes related to the natural course of pulmonary hypertension and routine clinical follow-up. The results may provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the safety and consequences of non-elective ERA substitution in real-world care.

Interventions

OTHERSwitch from Ambrisentan to Bosentan

This intervention refers to a therapeutic switch from ambrisentan (10 mg once daily) to bosentan (125 mg twice daily) in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), performed as part of routine clinical care. The switch was not assigned by the investigators but was made based on clinical indications prior to study enrollment. Patients are followed prospectively for up to 6 months to assess changes in risk stratification, functional status, laboratory parameters, and safety outcomes.

DRUGMaintenance of Ambrisentan Therapy

Continued treatment with ambrisentan 10 mg once daily without transition to bosentan, as part of routine clinical care. Treatment was not assigned by the investigators. Clinical, functional, laboratory, and safety outcomes are assessed over a 3- to 6-month period.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) by right heart catheterization * Documented therapeutic switch from ambrisentan (10 mg once daily) to bosentan (125 mg twice daily) within the previous 6 months for the switch group * Treatment with ambrisentan for at least 6 months without switching to bosentan for the maintenance group

Exclusion criteria

* History of severe hepatic impairment * Incomplete clinical or laboratory records that prevent risk score calculation * Inability to attend clinical follow-up between 3 and 6 months after medication switch

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in risk category according to used scoresFrom 3 to 6 monthsProportion of participants with worsening clinical risk category from baseline to follow-up, comparing patients who switched from ambrisentan to bosentan with patients who remained on ambrisentan..

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Class3 to 6 monthsChange in functional class between baseline and follow-up (classified as improvement, worsening, or no change), as an indicator of clinical status and exercise tolerance, and compared between the study groups.
Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)3 to 6 monthsChange in the distance walked during the 6-minute walk test (6MWD) between baseline and follow-up, measured in meters, to assess exercise capacity, and compare bewtween groups
Change in NT-proBNP Levels3 to 6 monthsVariation in serum NT-proBNP levels between baseline and follow-up to assess cardiac stress and right ventricular function. And comparison of this change between the study groups.
Incidence of Hepatotoxicity3 to 6 monthsNumber and proportion of patients who develop elevation of AST or ALT above 3 times the upper limit of normal during the follow-up period, indicating possible liver toxicity. And compared between the study groups.
Change in Hemoglobin Levels3 to 6 monthsChange in hemoglobin levels between baseline and follow-up, with specific attention to new or worsening anemia potentially associated with the medication switch. And compare between the study groups.
Change in Individual Parameters of risk stratification3 to 6 monthsIsolated variation in the individual components of the risk stratification without reclassification into composite risk strata. evaluated within and between the study groups.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

CONTACTCaio Fernandes, Principal Investigator
caio.cesar@hc.fm.usp.brPhD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026