Skip to content

QOL and Mental Health Using APD With Remote Monitoring System

The Investigation of Quality of Life and Mental Health Using Remote Monitoring System (Sharesource) With Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in End-stage Renal Disease Patients

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07012499
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Health Wellness 1, Quality of Life

Keywords

remote control, Automated peritoneal dialysis

Brief summary

Although peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a representative renal replacement therapy along with hemodialysis, number of PD patients decreases every year. Among the various contributing factors for such trends, the essential issue that the patients should perform dialytic therapy by themselves is thought to be critical for the patients to avoid choosing PD as primary dialytic therapy. In particular, unlike hemodialysis, the patients with PD have troubles in getting timely medical advice in their daily life, although continuous advice are essential for maintaining therapy. Thus, remote monitoring and control system is believed to be useful in PD therapy. Automated PD (APD) is a good option because of its convenience and improved accessibility. So, in Korea, although the rate of incident PD patients was decreased, the proportion of APD were rapidly increased (3.7% in 2001 vs. 39% in 2018, Korean Society of Nephrology (KSN) data) In the COVID-19 pandemic, the investigators should improve Remote therapy monitoring (RTM). Technologies that collect medical information and transmit it to health care providers for patient management, have the potential to improve the patients' outcomes without visiting hospital receiving automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) at home. However, there are only a few retrospective studies and no prospective study about remote patients monitoring programs in APD. Remote medical service is currently illegal in South Korea. However, recently the Korean government has approved remote medical service in only a few areas of Gangwon province, including Wonju city, which belongs to our institution. Thus, the investigators aim to use such a benefit to investigate the 'Quality of Life (QOL)' in Korean patients undergoing APD. The investigators plan to compare the various clinical indexes, including mainly QOL, mental health focusing depression, and volume-nutritional status between the patients with previous classic APD and APD combined by the SharesourceTM system (Baxter Co.).

Interventions

DEVICEAutomated peritoneal dialysis with Sharesource device

Patients receive APD with an FMC device that contains sharesource software which can communicate with the medical team.

DEVICEAPD without sharesource

Patients received APD with Same machine but this patients dose not using sharesource software

Sponsors

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

Comparison of the APD model with internet-based feedback system versus without it

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* More than 18 years old * ESRD patients on APD(≥1 month) * Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who plan to receive kidney transplantation within 1 year * Patients with co-morbidities: cardiovascular disease(myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmia), cancer, psychiatric diseases, liver cirrhosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
changes of quality of life BDI6, 12 months
changes of quality of life CESD6, 12 months
changes of quality of life KDQOL-366, 12 months
changes of quality of life PHQ-96, 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Questionnaire form.6,12 monthschange of PD perscription, personalized prescription changes, hospital admission, ER admission, unplanned hospital visit, exchanges over telephone
Body mass index (BMI: kg/m2)6 months, 12 months
adverse events12 monthsperitonitis, mechanical comlications
change volume status6, 12 monthsOverhydration (measured by bioimpedance device)
change nutrition status6, 12 monthsGNRI (geriatric nutrition risk index), Handgrip strength test (kg)
dialysis adequacy6,12 monthsKT/V

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time or PD90 DaysTotal time of PD
Medical coast of treatment12 monthMedical coast

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026