Skip to content

Venetoclax + Azacytidine for Newly Diagnosed ETP-like ALL and T-ALL With Myeloid Mutations

Evaluating the Efficacy of Venetoclax Combined With Azacitidine Induction Therapy of Early T-cell Precursor-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and T-ALL With Myeloid Mutations

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07012447
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2028-05-01
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, T/Myeloid, Nos, T-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Keywords

Adverse risk, newly diagnosed, induction therapy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in treating newly diagnosed early T-cell precursor (ETP)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/myeloid mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL). Participant population: Patients aged ≥14 years diagnosed with ETP-like leukemia, T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/My-MPAL, regardless of sex/gender. The main question it aims to answer: Does venetoclax plus azacitidine achieve a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR: CR + CRi) compared to historical controls (54% vs. 90%) after two induction cycles? Comparison group: Researchers will compare ORR outcomes to historical data from conventional chemotherapy regimens to assess treatment superiority. Participants will: * Receive two 28-day cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m²/day SC, D1-7). * Undergo serial bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging (e.g., PET-CT) for response assessment. * Follow dose adjustment protocols for toxicity management (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia).

Detailed description

This study addresses the unmet need for effective therapies in high-risk T-ALL subtypes, including ETP-like leukemia and T/My-MPAL, which exhibit myeloid-like genetic profiles (e.g., FLT3, DNMT3A, RUNX1 mutations) and poor outcomes under conventional chemotherapy (5-year OS \<40%). Preclinical and pilot clinical data demonstrate that venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, synergizes with azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent, to induce apoptosis in leukemia stem cells by targeting oxidative phosphorylation and epigenetic dysregulation. Building on a pilot study, this Phase II trial employs a single-arm design to validate efficacy in a larger cohort. Patients receive two induction cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m² SC D1-7), with response assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular testing (Days 22-35). Early Efficacy Evaluation: After the first induction cycle (Days 22-35), response is assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular profiling. Stopping Criteria: Patients failing to achieve at least partial remission (PR) after Cycle 1 will be withdrawn from the study. Patients failing to achieve CR or CRi at the end of Cycle 2 will also discontinue study treatment. Consolidation strategies include allo-HSCT or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) for fit patients or maintenance therapy for unfit individuals. Rigorous safety monitoring follows NCI-CTCAE v5.0 criteria, with dose adjustments for hematologic/non-hematologic toxicities. Statistical analysis includes intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with ORR analyzed via exact binomial tests and survival endpoints via Kaplan-Meier/Cox regression. The study integrates translational biomarkers (e.g., BCL-2 expression, mutational profiling) to identify predictors of response, aiming to establish a novel, mechanism-driven regimen for these aggressive leukemias.

Interventions

DRUGVenetoclax

Orally by mouth

DRUGAzacitidine

Subcutaneous injection

DRUGCytarabine

Intravenous infusion

Sponsors

yuejun Liu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. No gender restrictions 2. Age ≥ 14 years 3. Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following: ETP-like leukemia (CD7⁺, CD1a-, CD8-, with CD5 expression stratified as ETP-ALL ≤75% or Near-ETP-ALL \>75%) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) with myeloid mutations (including FLT3, DNMT3A, STAG2, IDH1/2, RUNX1, EZH2, WT1, ASXL1/2, SF3B1, TET2, BCOR, BCORL1, and MLL-PTD) T/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL) (with concurrent T-lineage and myeloid markers, e.g., cCD3⁺/mCD3⁺, CD7⁺, MPO⁺) 4. Newly diagnosed patients without prior induction therapy Limited prior therapy allowed: hydroxyurea, dexamethasone, or low-dose cytarabine/venetoclax (cumulative dose \<0.5g), and leukocytapheresis 5. Expected survival time ≥ 3 months 6. Liver function: total bilirubin ≤ 2× ULN; ALT/AST ≤ 3× ULN (or ≤ 5× ULN if liver infiltration by leukemia is present) ; Renal function: endogenous creatinine clearance ≥ 30 ml/min; Cardiac function: left ventricular ejection fraction \> 45% 7. Demonstrated capacity to understand the study and willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of recurrent genetic abnormalities such as t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16)/t(16;16) leukemia 2. Prior hypersensitivity to study drugs or compounds of similar chemical structure 3. Active uncontrolled infections as determined by the investigator 4. Active bleeding 5. Recent history (within 1 year) of thrombosis, embolism, or cerebral hemorrhage 6. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or unwillingness to use contraception in women of childbearing potential 7. Drug addiction or chronic alcoholism that could interfere with trial evaluation 8. Psychiatric disorders or other conditions that would prevent obtaining informed consent or compliance with trial requirements 9. Any condition deemed unsuitable for trial participation by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response rate (ORR) after two treatment cycles of induction therapytime from the date of enrollment to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)Rates of complete remission (CR), and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OS: overall survival2 yearstime from the date of enrollment to death from any cause or the last follow-up
LFS:leukemia-free survival2 yearsthe duration from the date of enrollment to the occurrence of treatment failure, relapse, death from any cause, or the last follow-up.
DOR: duration of remission2 yearsTime between the first remission and relapse
AEWithin 60 days after treatmentAdverse events during the induction treatment.
Volume of infused blood productsWithin 60 daysThe volume of infused blood products during the induction treatment.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYue-jun Liu
liuyuejun@suda.edu.cn008613915535177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026