Skip to content

Precision Analytic Research Methods in OCD

Dissecting Neurocognitive Components of Compulsivity Using Computational Modeling and EEG

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07011901
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
2025-07-09
Completion date
2030-03-31
Last updated
2025-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Keywords

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Exposure and response prevention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Electroencephalogram

Brief summary

Psychiatric disorders characterized by compulsivity, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), result in considerable functional impairment and many individuals do not respond to gold-standard treatments. Compulsivity has long been thought to occur due to exaggerated habits and reduced goal-directed control, although more recently, this conceptualization of compulsivity as an imbalance of two cognitive systems has been challenged as overly narrow. This study will recruit 100 individuals (50 adults diagnosed with OCD, 50 healthy controls) and leverage the measurement precision offered by theory-driven computational modeling in combination with electroencephalogram (EEG) to go beyond this binary theory of compulsivity, revealing how more complex interactions of neurocognitive subcomponents contribute to compulsivity-information that could ultimately lead to improved treatment personalization and clinical outcomes.

Interventions

Exposure and response prevention (EX/RP) is the gold-standard behavioral treatment for OCD. It involves confronting the content of obsessions (distressing thoughts, images, or impulses) and resisting the urge to engage in compulsions (observable behaviors or mental acts that are repeated to reduce the anxiety/distress associated with compulsions).

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be: * between the ages 18-55 years old * English-speaking * right-handed * able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Individuals diagnosed with OCD will be excluded if: * they meet diagnostic criteria for certain other psychiatric disorders * are taking psychiatric medication or have received behavioral treatment for OCD within a certain timeframe * if it is unsafe for them to participate in research Healthy control participants will be excluded if: * they have a current psychiatric disorder * a lifetime history of certain psychiatric disorders * are taking psychiatric medication or have in the past * have a parent or sibling who has been diagnosed with OCD * if it is unsafe for them to participate in research

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive ScaleWeek 1, Week 5, Week 10A semi-structured clinician-administered instrument used to measure obsessions and compulsions separately over five dimensions (time consumed, distress, interference, degree of resistance, control). The range of scores for the Obsessions and Compulsions subscales is 0-20, and the range for the total score is 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity, and a total score greater or equal to 16 is considered indicative of moderately severe OCD

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Obsessive Compulsive Inventory- RevisedWeek 1, Week 5, Week 10An 18-item self-report measure to assess obsessions and compulsions that demonstrates good psychometric properties and has been used in other research as a transdiagnostic measure of compulsivity. The range of scores for the six subscales (Washing; Obsessing; Ordering; Checking; Neutralizing; Hoarding) is 0-12. The range for the total score is 0-60 and does not include the Hoarding subscale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Cambridge-Chicago Compulsivity Trait ScaleWeek 1, Week 5, Week 10A 15-item self-report measure to assess compulsivity transdiagnostically that exhibits high internal consistency and excellent convergent validity with gold-standard measures of compulsive symptoms. The range for the total score is 0-45, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity
Self-Report Habit IndexWeek 1, Week 5, Week 10A 12-item self-report measure of the repetition and automaticity of a behavior that exhibits high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The range for the total score is 12-84, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Dimensional Obsessive- Compulsive ScaleWeek 1, Week 5, Week 10A 20-item self-report measure that assesses four of the most consistently replicated thematic dimensions of OCD symptoms (i.e., contamination, harm, symmetry, repugnant content). The DOCS demonstrates good to excellent internal consistency, validity, and sensitivity. The range of scores for the four subscales (Contamination; Harm; Unacceptable Thoughts; Symmetry) is 0-20, and the range for the total score is 0-80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAmy Rapp, Ph.D.
OCDResearch@mssm.edu212-241-5288

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026