Skip to content

Food Insecurity, Food as Medicine, Hypertension

Development of a User Centered Design Approach for Screening, Referral, and Enrollment in Food as Medicine Among Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07011251
Enrollment
159
Registered
2025-06-08
Start date
2024-08-16
Completion date
2025-01-29
Last updated
2026-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Insecurity, Hypertension

Keywords

Food as medicine

Brief summary

Development of a user centered design to understand how a tailored food is medicine program based on user preferences and needs improves engagement and clinical outcomes. The study will examine how patients, screened either face to face or through automated for food insecurity, engage in a food is medicine program over 12-weeks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFood as Medicine Program

Grocery Prescription - participants will receive a card loaded with $100 per month to be used on the Instacart Fresh Funds program website/app or a SodaHealth grocery prescription card to be used inside a Kroger or Food City stores. Patients who select grocery delivery where Instacart is not available will receive Food City meals for the same value. or 2) Medically Tailored Meals (MTM) - participants receive approximately 5 frozen meals per week from Mom's Meals that follow an approved diet for those with hypertension. Participants will complete screening questions (screening decision tree attached) after informed consent to determine which food package the participant will receive. The screening decision tree is a tool that asks about kitchen availability for preparing foods, skills, and access to transportation. Depending on how the patient answers they will receive either grocery prescription or MTM for 3-months or 12-weeks.

OTHERSurvey

Participants answering "no" to assistance but agreeing to the 20-30 minute survey will receive a direct link to a survey related to reasons for not wanting assistance to answer questions at one time point.

Sponsors

Alison Gustafson
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The intervention consisted of allocating patients to receive either medically tailored meals or grocery Rx program based on their preferences and resource constraints.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Hypertension in last 12 months * Experiencing food insecurity as indicated by 2-item Hunger Vital Sign * English or Spanish speaking * No plans to move from the area for at least 1 year * Willing and able to accept text messages * Free living to the extent that participant has control over dietary intake * Willing and able to provide written informed consent and participate in all study activities.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant in weight research intervention in last 12 months * Considering bariatric surgery in the next year or prior bariatric surgery * Lack of safe, stable residence and ability to store meals * Lack of telephone which can receive text messages * Pregnancy/breastfeeding or intended pregnancy in the next year * Known drug or alcohol misuse in the past 2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change Systolic Blood PressureBaseline and week 12captured from the electronic medical record
Change Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline and week 12captured from the electronic medical record

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Dietary IntakeBaseline and week 12Dietary intake is captured with the Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ-10). Responses to these dietary intake questions are converted to daily cup equivalent estimates (e.g., 1.2 cups of vegetables per day, 1.1 cups of fruit per day, 2.3 cups of FVs per day) of daily FV intake. The 2020-2025 United States Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend consuming 2 to 3 cups of vegetables per day and 1.5 to 2 cups of fruit per day.
Number of Participants Who Answered Never/Rarely, Sometimes, Often/Always, and Don't Know to the Nutrition Security QuestionBaselineThe one item Gretchen Swanson Nutrition Security question will be asked as follows:In the past month, how often did the participant worry that the food bought wouldn't provide enough nutrients for the family, even if the participant had enough to eat? Response options are never, rarely, sometimes, often, always, don't know. We collapsed the categories of never/rarely; sometimes; often/always; don't know based on distribution of the data.
Number of Participants Reporting Food InsecurityBaselineUSDA 6-item food insecurity survey Scores range from 0-6 with higher scores equating to lower food security. Categories were created with low, marginal, and very low based on USDA scoring algorithm. Food security status is assigned as follows: * Raw score 0-1-High or marginal food security (raw score 1 may be considered marginal food security, but a large proportion of households that would be measured as having marginal food security using the household or adult scale will have raw score zero on the six-item scale) * Raw score 2-4-Low food security * Raw score 5-6-Very low food security For some reporting purposes, the food security status of households with raw score 0-1 is described as food secure and the two categories "low food security" and "very low food security" in combination are referred to as food insecure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlison Gustafson, PhD, MPH, RD

University of Kentucky

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Comparator Arm participants (participants answering "no to assistance but agreeing to the 20-30 minute survey) were not considered enrolled.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous52.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.87
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
144 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
111 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 340 / 117
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 340 / 117
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 26, 2026