Skip to content

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Feasibility, Safety and Short-term Oncosurgical Outcome of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Malignancy: A Single Centre Experience

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07009119
Acronym
LPD
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-06-06
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2025-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Fistula, Periampullary Cancer

Brief summary

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was first performed by Garner and Pomp in 1994. This is a technically difficult, time consuming and high rate of complication procedure. The reason is that duodenum and head of pancreas locate deeply in retroperitoneum and are surrounded by important structures such as inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein (SMV), portal vein (PV) and hepatic arteries. Injuring these structures during the surgery can lead to life-threatening complications. Moreover, doing anastomoses through laparoscopy, especially pancreatic anastomosis, is more difficult and takes more time than through open approach. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care. Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited. In this prospective study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD.

Detailed description

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was the standard treatment for a wide array of periampullary and pancreatic diseases including malignant and benign conditions. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care . Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited despite several improvements in surgical devices and techniques that have allowed surgeons to approach the pancreas laparoscopically, laparoscopic PD remains challenging. LPD represents one of the most advanced abdominal operations owing to the necessity of a complex dissection and reconstruction. Recent reports note that complete laparoscopic PD including laparoscopic resection and reconstruction is both technically feasible and safe. In this prospective study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD.

Interventions

The patient is positioned in French position (right arm in, left arm abducted 90°), with a suprapubic area reserved for Pfannenstiel incision. A 6-port technique is used: sub-umbilical (12 mm), four semi-circular trocars (two 12 mm, two 5 mm), and a sub-xiphoid trocar for liver retraction. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) proceeds if no vascular invasion/metastasis is found. Key steps include Kocher's maneuver, vessel ligation (gastroepiploic, gastric, gastroduodenal), lymphadenectomy (stations 5-17), pancreatic neck transection, and jejunal division. Reconstruction involves duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (or invaginating if duct unfound), hepaticojejunostomy, and stapled gastrojejunostomy. Margins are examined post-resection. Harmonic scalpel/Ligasure and staplers are used.

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients meeting the curative treatment intent in accordance with clinical guidelines: * No evidence of metastasis. * Radiological non-involvement of superior mesenteric vein & portal vein. * Preserved fat planes between celiac axis, hepatic artery & superior mesenteric artery. * Patients presenting with resectable pancreatic head cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, duodenal cancer and ampullary tumours who are fit for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Exclusion criteria

* Unfit patients for surgery due to severe medical illness. * Inoperable patients with distant metastases, including peritoneal, liver, distant lymph node metastases, and involvement of other organs. * Irresectable tumors in diagnostic laparoscopy. * Patients requiring left, central or total pancreatectomy or other palliative surgery. * History of other malignant disease. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women. * Patients with serious mental disorders. * Patients with vascular invasion and requiring vascular resection as evaluated by the multidisciplinary team team according to abdominal imaging data. * Pancreatoduodenectomy for other diagnosis like cystic lesions, benign tumors or chronic calcific pancreatitis * Patients with cirrhotic liver. * Patients refused to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathological Assessment of Surgical SpecimensAssessed at the time of surgical specimen pathological evaluation (typically within 1-2 weeks post-surgery).Evaluation of the surgical specimens will include: * Number of lymph nodes harvested: Total count of lymph nodes excised and examined during surgery. * Resected margin status: Assessment of the presence or absence of tumor cells at the resection margins, classified as negative (R0), microscopic positive (R1), or macroscopic positive (R2). * Ratio of positive lymph nodes to total lymph nodes harvested: Proportion (%) calculated by dividing the number of histopathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes by the total number of lymph nodes retrieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative time in minutesFrom time of skin incision till time of skin closureTime spent in surgery
Intra-operative blood lossday 0 (at the end of surgery)the amount of intra-operative blood loss (ml) at the end of surgery (d0): recorded by the anesthetist using a vacuum system.
The rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy4 weeks postoperativeOn or after the third postoperative day, the drain outflow of any detectable volume was treated as a pancreatic fistula with an amylase content larger than three times the upper normal serum amylase value
Amount of intraoperative blood transfusionFrom start of surgery of every participant till skin closureAmount of intraoperative packed red blood cell units transfused intraoperative
Length of postoperative surgical intensive care unit stayFrom the date of admission to surgical intensive care unit after surgery to the date of discharge to ward or death whichever comes first, assessed up to 3 months .Length of postoperative surgical intensive care unit stay In days
Postoperative length of stayup to 90 daysthe time from being admitted to hospital to discharge

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSaleh K Saleh, MD
salehkhairy@mu.edu.eg01201765401
Backup ContactRabeh K Saleh, MD
Rabeh.Saleh@mu.edu.eg01220065443

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026