Skip to content

Diagnostic Performance of the CandID PLUS PCR for the Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the CandID PLUS PCR for the Detection of Candida Spp. in Peritoneal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Intra-abdominal Candidiasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07005258
Acronym
CANDIDIAG
Enrollment
88
Registered
2025-06-05
Start date
2025-04-17
Completion date
2025-04-17
Last updated
2025-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candida, Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients, Intra-Abdominal Infection, Molecular Diagnostic, Peritonitis Infectious

Keywords

intra-abdominal candidiasis, secondary peritonitis, candida, PCR, molecular diagnostic

Brief summary

Invasive candidiasis are the most common form of fungal infection in critically ill patients, particularly intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The current diagnostic gold standard relies on conventional fungal culture, which has a long turnaround time and may delay targeted antifungal therapy. Non-culture-based assays such as 1,3-β-D-glucan lack specificity for early and definitive diagnosis. Molecular diagnostics, including PCR, offer faster and more specific detection, but their clinical use remains limited. The CandID PLUS PCR assay targets major Candida species and has not yet been evaluated on peritoneal fluid. The CANDIDIAG study aims to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR in detecting Candida spp. in peritoneal fluid from ICU patients with suspected IAC. This study constitutes a post-hoc analysis of the pBDG2 study (Prospective evaluation of the peritoneal 1.3 Beta-D-glucan for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal candidiasis in the critically ill patients) registered with the number NCT 03997929). Therefore, all patients have been already recruited. For the CANDIDIAG study, we will use the biological collection of peritoneal fluid issue from the pBDG2 study. All patients with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis are identified. We will test de CandID PCR, retrospectively, on their peritoneal fluid and compared the results with the fungal culture.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult critically ill patient * with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis (culture positive with Candida albicans, glabrata, parapsilosis, tropicalis, krusei, and dubliniensis) * enrolled in the pBDG2 study (NCT 03997929) * intra-abdominal candidiasis documented at

Exclusion criteria

* Declined to participate * intra-abdominal candidiasis caused by other candida species

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR for the detection of Candida albicans, glabrata, parapsilosis, tropicalis, krusei, and dubliniensis in peritoneal fluid of ICU patients with intra-abdominal candidiasisDay of the surgerySensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the CandID PLUS PCR, using fungal culture as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR with that of peritoneal 1,3-β-D-glucanDay of the surgerySensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of peritoneal 1,3-β-D-glucan compared with fungal culture; diagnostic performance comparison between CandID PLUS PCR and 1,3-β-D-glucan (including ROC curve analysis)
To explore the association between PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values (as a proxy for fungal load) and clinical parameters, including SOFA score and ICU mortalityDay 1 (surgery) to Day 28Association between PCR Ct values and clinical severity (SOFA score) and ICU mortality

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026