Skip to content

Comparison of Drainage Methods in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (DEMURE)

Comparison of the Application Effects of Different Drainage Modes in the Perioperative Period of Minimally Invasive Three-Field Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07004634
Enrollment
75
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drainage/Methods, Esophageal Cancer, Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Esophageal cancer, Mediastinal drainage tube, Postoperative pain

Brief summary

This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.

Interventions

PROCEDUREChest mediastinal tube

Transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.

PROCEDUREAbdominal mediastinal tube

Transperitoneal mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.

PROCEDUREChest tube + chest mediastinal tube

Chest tube insertion combined with transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer requiring three-incision esophagectomy (cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions) * ASA physical status class I-III

Exclusion criteria

* History of chronic pain or long-term use of analgesics prior to surgery * Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (e.g., FEV1 \<50%) * Coagulation disorders or patients undergoing reoperation * Intraoperative findings of extensive pleural adhesions, combined resection of adjacent organs, or other conditions deemed by the investigator to warrant exclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain ScoresPain scores were recorded at different times during the postoperative period when the patients were quiet and active (at 7 AM, 11 AM, 3 PM, and 7 PM) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4.Pain scores were assessed based on the visual analog scale according to the World Health Organization guidelines, in which 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst possible pain. We also recorded and evaluated maximum daily pain scores when pain caused by the mediastinal drainage tube incision.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complicationsPostoperative complications from posoperative day 1 to postoperative month 3Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak, major pulmonary complications, and major abdominal complications. Pleural effusion was defined as a drainage volume of greater than 800 mL. Pneumothorax was defined by a distance of greater than 3 cm between the apex of the lung and the top of the ribcage on chest radiography.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHecheng Li, PhD, MD
lihecheng2000@hotmail.com00862164370045
Backup ContactWangyang Meng, MD
mengwymed@163.com00861592767592

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026