Skip to content

the MCCE vs EGD Trial

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs Esophago-gastro-Duodenoscopy as The Initial Investigation for Anaemia in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (the MCCE vs EGD Trial) - a Single Centre Randomized Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07004530
Enrollment
238
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-09-24
Completion date
2027-11-24
Last updated
2025-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Anaemia

Keywords

Capsule Endoscopy, Esophago-gastro-Duodenoscopy

Brief summary

Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.

Detailed description

Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.

Interventions

. The MCCE used in this study is the magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE, AnPx USA) which is a capsule measuring 28x12mm, and contains a permanent magnet inside its dome. Images are captured and recorded at 2 frames/s

PROCEDUREEsophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD)

Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly performed to look for source of bleeding in patients with anaemia. However, from our own analysis and from retrospective studies of EGD in patients with ACS, EGD finding was normal or non-significant in 20-80% patients14-16. Moreover, EGD was associated with non-negligible periprocedural risks in patients with ACS, including death directly attributed to EGD (9.1%; 95% CI 7.6-10.9%), hypotension (24.1%; 95% CI 17.0-32.9%), arrhythmias (8.3%; 95% CI 4.5-15.1%) and recurrent ACS (6.5%; 95% CI 3.2-12.8%)

Sponsors

Health and Medical Research Fund
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized by one of the research team staff via sealed envelopes with computer generated randomization number to one of the two study arms (0 for EGD, 1 for CE) in a 1:1 ratio, according to a central randomization scheme. Due to the nature of the interventions, researchers and patients are not blinded to group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

subjects are patients older than 18 years old with: 1. the diagnosis of ACS as defined by symptoms of chest pain or shortness-of-breath, abnormal electrocardiogram and positive enzyme, requiring coronary intervention 2. new-onset anaemia as defined by Hb\<11 g/dL on admission blood taking

Exclusion criteria

1. History of active haematological disease including hemoglobinopathies such as thalassemia, Myelodysplastic syndromes, haematological malignancy, aplastic anaemia, or autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. 2. Patients with known active gastrointestinal malignancy. 3. Contraindications for CE: suspected or known gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis, fistula, diverticula, presence of gastrointestinal obstruction symptoms such as pain or dysphagia; inoperative conditions or refusal to undergo abdominal surgery if required; history of laparotomy, gastric or bowel surgery; presence of metallic implants that is not MRI conditional. 4. Contraindications for EGD: Possible gastrointestinal perforation, medically unstable patients, patient with known pharyngeal diverticulum, and patients with recent head and neck trauma. 5. Inability to take 1-month DAPT such as non-deferrable surgery within 1 months, severe allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors, or patients in whom 1 months DAPT is not indicated. 6. Patients whose life-expectancy is less than 6 months. 7. Patients who are pregnant or lactating. 8. Patients who are unable to give informed consent. 9. Patients who are in active heart failure or fluid-overload state. 10. Patients who have chronic renal failure as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate \<15 ml/min/1.73m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the occurrence of recurrent bleedingbaseline, 30 daysA bleeding event will be defined according to international consensus by the occurrence of any of the followings: 1) overt bleeding of gastroduodenal origin including fresh hematemesis, bloody nasogastric aspiration, melena after normalization of stool colour, or haematochezia after normalization of stool colour, or 2) bleeding of presumed occult gastrointestinal origin with a documented reduction in haemoglobin concentration of ≥2 g/dl or reduction in the haematocrit by 10% or more from the baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for any transfusionbaseline, 30 daysNeed for any transfusion
Any bleeding by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) and GUSTO definitionsbaseline, 30 daysTIMI flow grade is a method used to assess coronary artery blood flow during and after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It's a standardized way to grade the degree of reperfusion, ranging from complete occlusion (Grade 0) to complete perfusion (Grade 3). BARC: Type 1: Minimal bleeding, not actionable. Type 2: Clinically evident but minor; requires treatment. Type 3: Significant bleeding, divided into 3A (moderate, requires transfusion), 3B (major, may need surgery), and 3C (critical, such as intracranial bleeding). Type 4: Bleeding related to CABG procedures.
Change in Major adverse cardiac eventsbaseline, 30 daysMACE as defined by death of cardiovascular origin, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization.
Any adverse events and complications from MCCE and/or from EGDbaseline, 30 daysAny adverse events and complications from MCCE and/or from EGD

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026