Skip to content

Effects of Soft Tissue Mobilization and Vibration Therapy in Competitive Rowers

Comparative Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Percussion Vibration Therapy on Balance, Explosive Strength, and Functional Performance in Competitive Adolescent Rowers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07004374
Enrollment
45
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-06-13
Completion date
2025-07-10
Last updated
2025-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balanced, Soft Tissue Injuries

Keywords

Rowing, Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), Percussion massage therapy, Balance, Explosive strength, Functional performance

Brief summary

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and percussion massage therapy on balance, explosive strength, and functional performance in competitive adolescent rowers. A total of 45 participants aged 13-18 will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: vibration therapy group, soft tissue mobilization group, and control group. Interventions will target the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles. Outcome measures include the Y Balance Test, vertical jump, hop tests, and isometric muscle strength via myometry. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence-based insights into optimizing performance and injury prevention strategies in rowing athletes.

Detailed description

Rowing is a high-performance sport that demands coordinated action of the upper and lower extremities, trunk muscles, and cardiovascular system. Due to repetitive pulling movements, rowers are prone to musculoskeletal overload injuries, particularly in the lower back, shoulders, knees, and ankles. Effective balance control and lower extremity explosive strength are critical for performance enhancement and injury prevention in rowing athletes. Soft tissue mobilization techniques and vibration therapies are emerging modalities that may enhance muscle flexibility, joint mobility, and neuromuscular activation, thereby contributing to athletic performance. This randomized controlled study is designed to evaluate the effects of two different interventions-instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) using the Graston technique, and percussion massage therapy using a handheld massage gun-on balance, explosive strength, and functional performance in competitive adolescent rowers aged 13-18. A total of 45 athletes meeting inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Vibration Group (percussion therapy at 33Hz), Soft Tissue Mobilization Group (IASTM), and Control Group (no intervention). Both interventions will be applied to the quadriceps femoris and gastrocnemius muscles over standardized durations and protocols. Functional outcomes will be measured using the Y Balance Test, vertical jump test, single-leg hop tests (single, triple, crossover, square hop), and a 6-meter timed hop. Muscle strength will be evaluated using a myometer to assess isometric force production of the quadriceps and gastrosoleus muscles. Assessments will be conducted pre- and post-intervention. The study is expected to provide clinically relevant data on the efficacy of myofascial techniques in enhancing functional capacity and performance parameters in young elite athletes. Findings may support the incorporation of soft tissue techniques and vibration therapy into performance training and injury prevention protocols for rowing and similar sports.

Interventions

Participants receive percussion massage therapy (33 Hz) applied to the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles using a handheld massage device for 5 minutes per muscle group.

Participants receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM, Graston technique) applied to the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles using stainless steel tools with standardized techniques (Sweep, Fan, Brush) for 6 minutes.

Sponsors

Medipol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel-group design to evaluate the comparative effects of two different therapeutic interventions-instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and percussion vibration therapy-on balance, explosive strength, and functional performance in adolescent competitive rowers. A total of 45 participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1: Vibration Therapy Group (percussion massage therapy at 33 Hz) Group 2: Soft Tissue Mobilization Group (Graston technique/IASTM) Group 3: Control Group (no intervention)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 13 and 18 years * Licensed rowing athlete for at least 2 years * Participating in at least 4 training sessions per week * No lower extremity injury in the past 6 months * Voluntary participation and signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* History of surgery in the knee, hip, or ankle * Neurological, vestibular, or systemic balance disorders * Use of medications that may affect physical performance * Orthopedic conditions that prevent participation in performance tests

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Y Balance Test Composite ScorePre-intervention and immediately post-interventionAssesses dynamic balance and postural control of the lower extremities. During the test, participants perform maximal reach in three directions-anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral-while maintaining a single-leg stance. The composite score is calculated by averaging the reach distances in all three directions, normalized to the participant's leg length using the formula: Composite Score = (Anterior + Posteromedial + Posterolateral) / (3 × limb length) × 100 Scale Range: 0 to 100% Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better dynamic balance and greater postural control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Single-Leg Hop TestsPre-intervention and immediately post-interventionAssesses unilateral functional lower limb performance and dynamic stability. Participants perform a maximal forward hop on one leg, and the distance is measured. Unit of Measure: centimeters (cm) Scale Range: Not fixed (typically 50-250 cm) Interpretation: Greater distances reflect better functional strength and neuromuscular control.
6-Meter Timed Hop TestPre-intervention and immediately post-interventionAssesses power, speed, and dynamic control over a short distance using a single-leg hop. Total time to complete 6 meters is recorded.
Vertical Jump HeightPre-intervention and immediately post-interventionMeasures lower extremity explosive strength. Participants perform a countermovement jump, and the maximum vertical jump height is recorded. Unit of Measure: centimeters (cm) Scale Range: Not fixed (depends on physical capacity; typically 10-80 cm) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater explosive power in the lower extremities.
Isometric Muscle Strength of Quadriceps and GastrocnemiusPre-intervention and immediately post-interventionAssessed with a hand-held myometer to measure maximal isometric force in Newtons.Myometer device with standard positioning and stabilization.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026