Skip to content

ARCS-Based Training to Improve Nursing Students' Communication, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy

The Effect of Training Based on the ARCS Motivation Model on Nursing Students' Communication Skills, Learning Motivation, and Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07004205
Acronym
ARCS-NCOMSE
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-05-26
Completion date
2025-06-20
Last updated
2025-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Educational Intervention, Motivation Model

Keywords

ARCS Motivation Model, nursing students, communication skills, learning motivation, self-efficacy levels

Brief summary

This study explores the impact of an ARCS-based training program on nursing students' communication skills, learning motivation, and self-efficacy. Communication is essential in nursing for quality patient care and safety, yet students often struggle with it. The ARCS Motivation Model-focused on Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction-aims to boost motivation and improve learning outcomes. Using a randomized controlled design, the study compares an experimental group receiving ARCS-based training with a control group receiving traditional education. Key outcomes include improved communication skills, motivation, and self-efficacy. This research highlights the potential of the ARCS model in enhancing nursing education and student performance.

Detailed description

This study aims to examine the impact of an education program based on the ARCS Motivation Model on nursing students' communication skills, learning motivation, and self-efficacy levels. The nursing profession requires not only clinical knowledge and technical skills but also effective communication abilities, as communication plays a crucial role in enhancing patient care quality and ensuring patient safety. However, research has shown that nursing students often face deficiencies in their communication skills, which can negatively affect their professional development. Consequently, there is an increasing need for learner-centered and motivating educational approaches. The ARCS Motivation Model, consisting of four key components-Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction-aims to enhance learning motivation. Literature suggests that this model positively impacts nursing students' learning processes. This study investigates whether ARCS-based training is effective in improving nursing students' communication skills, learning motivation, and self-efficacy. The research will be conducted using a randomized controlled design with first-year nursing students from Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University. The students will be randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The experimental group will receive ARCS-based education, while the control group will receive traditional education. The study will evaluate whether there are significant differences in communication skills, learning motivation, and self-efficacy between the two groups at the end of the training process. Data will be collected using the Effective Communication Skills Scale, Learning Motivation Scale, Self-Efficacy Scale, and a Demographic Information Form. These instruments will measure the participants' communication skills, motivation levels, and demographic characteristics. The ARCS model's four stages (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) will be applied through teaching materials and group activities during the intervention. In conclusion, this study aims to explore the effects of an ARCS-based training model in improving nursing students' communication skills and motivation, providing insights into the effectiveness of motivation-enhancing educational methods.

Interventions

OTHERThe ARCS Motivation Model Education

The ARCS Motivation Model Education-focused on Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction

Sponsors

Cumhuriyet University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Intervention Group Training Program (2 Weeks) Location: Classroom setting (theoretical classroom/conference hall/seminar room) Week 1, Day 1 (60 minutes) - Attention & Relevance * Introduction with background music and attention-grabbing case videos * Examples of nurse-patient communication (analysis of short scenarios containing communication errors) * Role-playing to demonstrate communication rules Week 1, Day 2 (60 minutes) - Confidence * Communication techniques (empathy, feedback, active listening) * In-group practices (role reversals) * Success-enhancing mini quizzes & positive feedback Week 1, Day 3 (60 minutes) - Satisfaction * Reward-based case analysis (small in-class rewards) * Participant presentations and group evaluations * Feedback-focused case studies Week 1, Day 4 (90 minutes) - Reinforcement of Entire ARCS Application * Scenario practice (difficult patient, emotional patient) * Evaluation forms & reflective journal exercises Week 2, Day 1 (60 minutes) - Follow-Up

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be enrolled in the 1st year of the Nursing Faculty * Must be participating in clinical practice (internship) for the first time * Must voluntarily agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form * Must agree to attend all designated sessions during the training period * Must have proficiency in reading and writing Turkish * Must have a suitable health condition for participation in individual and group activities

Exclusion criteria

Has previously participated in any clinical practice/internship * Has previously attended specialized training on communication skills, self-efficacy, or learning motivation * Unable to attend 2 or more sessions during the research process * Decides to withdraw from participation during the research or withdraws consent * Provides incomplete or incorrect responses to data (significant omissions in pre-test or post-test forms)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
communication skills1 week before and 2 weeks after the interventionCommunication Skills Measured by: Effective Communication Skills Scale (Range: 34-170; higher scores indicate better communication skills)
learning motivation1 week before and 2 weeks after the interventionMotivationMeasured by: Motivation Scale Related to Instructional Material (Range: 33-165; higher scores indicate better learning motivation)
self-efficacy levels1 week before and 2 weeks after the interventionSelf-efficacy Measured by: Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (Range: 33-165; higher scores indicate better self-efficacy)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactHülya KOÇYİĞİT KAVAK, Phd
hkocyigit@cumhuriyet.edu.tr90-555-040-88-76

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026