Skip to content

Effectiveness of Corticosteroid and 5% Dextrose Versus USG-guided Ozone Injections in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Three Blind Randomized Studies

Effectiveness of Corticosteroid and 5% Dextrose Versus USG-guided Ozone Injections in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Three Blind Randomized Studies

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07002892
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2025-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment

Keywords

Ozone therapy, corticosteroid injection, %5 dextrose injection, median nerve, carpal tunnel syndrome

Brief summary

Effectiveness of corticosteroid and 5% dextrose versus USG-guided ozone injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: Three blind randomized studies

Detailed description

Patients who were diagnosed with moderate CTS by EMG after clinically diagnosing CTS in our hospital's PTR clinic will be included in our study. At the beginning of the study, based on the study conducted by Wu et al. (1) who evaluated the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, the minimum number of patients required for each group was determined as 20 with a mean pain VAS change of 20%, a significance level of 0.05 and a power analysis of 95%. Considering that there may be a 20% loss during the study, it was decided to include a total of 72 patients, at least 24 patients for each group. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and fill out the Informed Volunteer Consent Form will be numbered according to their application order to the PTR clinic and will be randomized into three groups of 24 people using the Research Randomizer computer program, with the first group being the Ozone Group (OG), the second group being the Dextrose Group (DG) and the third group being the Corticosteroid Group (SG). Initial evaluations of the participants will be made before the injection. Each patient will receive one session of perineural injection of 1 ml betamethasone dipropionate mixed with 1 ml physiological serum to the first group; 2 ml 5% dextrose to the second group; and 2 ml 10 pg/ml ozone to the third group. The solutions to be administered will be prepared by one person in syringes that are taped shut from the outside, and then applied with a 27-gauge needle by a specialist physician who has no role in the evaluation of the results of the randomization section, from the proximal entrance of the carpal tunnel (scaphoid-psiform plane) under ultrasound guidance. In addition, each patient will wear a wrist splint for 8 hours daily during the post-treatment follow-up period. Treatment follow-up evaluations will be evaluated blindly by another specialist physician who has no role in the randomization, outcome evaluation and injection. Pre-treatment Visual Analog Scale (Global Pain), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale), Ultrasound (Measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area at pisiform level), EMG (Distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity), Hand grip strength measurement test (Dynamometer), VAS, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Ultrasound, Hand grip strength measurement test at the 4th week, VAS, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Ultrasound, Hand grip strength measurement test at the 12th week and VAS, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Ultrasound, Hand grip strength measurement test at the 24th week.

Interventions

DRUGOzon treatment

Each patient will receive 2 ml 10 μg/ml ozon perineural injection into the median nerve under US guidance, for 1 session.

Each patient will receive 2 ml:(1 ml betamethasone dipropionate+1ml saline) perineural injection into the median nerve under US guidance, for 1 session.

Each patient will receive 2 ml %5 dextrose perineural injection into the median nerve under US guidance, for 1 session.

Sponsors

Yunus Burak Bayır
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

İnvestigator, out comes assessor and participants will be blind to which procedure is performed.

Intervention model description

Our study was designed as a prospective, triple-blind, randomized study. Patients who applied to our hospital's PMR outpatient clinic and were diagnosed with moderate carpal tunnel syndrome by EMG will be included in the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being between 18-65 years old * Have been clinically diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome * Confirmation of moderate CTS diagnosis with EMG * Having typical CTS symptoms for at least 3 months * Not having benefited from splinting and rest

Exclusion criteria

* History of polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome or wrist surgery * History of inflammatory arthritis, hypothyroidism, pregnancy, rheumatologic disorders or pacemaker * Current warfarin use, previous corticosteroid injection for CTS, trauma or neoplasm at the injection site, hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or skin infection(injection site) * G6PD deficiency, hyperthyroidism, thrombocytopenia, severe cardiovascular instability and those receiving ACE inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale(VAS)This evaluation will be made and recorded at the baseline, at the 4th, 12th and 24th weeks after the procedure.Global pain:The VAS used for pain assessment consists of a line drawn in the form a ruler,and numbers from 0 to 10(with 0 as ''no pain'' and 10 as ''unbearable pain'' ) were asked to score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Boston Carpal Tunnel QuestionnaireThis evaluation will be made and recorded at the baseline, at the 4th, 12th and 24th weeks after the procedure.symptom severity and functional status scale
ElectromyographyThis evaluation will be made and recorded at the beginning and at 24th weeksDistal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity
DynamometerThis evaluation will be made and recorded at the baseline, at the 4th, 12th and 24th weeks after the procedure.Hand grip strength measurement test
UltrasoundThis evaluation will be made and recorded at the baseline, at the 4th, 12th and 24th weeks after the procedure.Median nerve cross-sectional area measurement at the pisiform level

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactYUNUS BURAK BAYIR, SPECİALİST
yunusburakbayir@gmail.com+905058083317
Backup ContactAYŞEGÜL YAMAN, SPECİALİST
05052423917

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026