Skip to content

Bright Light Therapy for Depressed Geriatric Inpatients

The LIGHT-60 Trial - Light Intervention for Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Depression Treatment

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07002554
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-06-03
Start date
2025-11-14
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2025-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unipolar Depression

Keywords

Depression, Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Stress Disorders

Brief summary

Bright light therapy has been shown to be effective for the treatment of both seasonal and non-seasonal unipolar depression as well as bipolar depression, primarily in outpatients under the age of 60. There is a dearth of studies exploring the efficacy of this treatment modality among elderly depressed inpatients, which is our study population.

Detailed description

Investigators are studying the ability of light therapy to reduce depressive symptoms in elderly patients who are hospitalized with unipolar depression (depression that is not due to bipolar disorder). Participants will receive either active light treatment or inactive treatment (also known as placebo).

Interventions

DEVICEBright light therapy

the Verilux® HappyLight® Lumi Plus light therapy box, which delivers UV-free, full-spectrum LED light at an intensity of 10,000 lux

The control group will use the same light box device, configured to emit dim red light. This will be achieved by setting the box to its lowest brightness setting and overlaying a translucent red filter over the light display. This setup is intended to maintain the appearance and experience of light exposure while minimizing any therapeutic effect.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A current episode of non-psychotic unipolar depression as the primary reason for psychiatric hospitalization * Currently hospitalized on the MUSC Senior Care Unit * Age 60 years or older * HAMD-17 ≥8

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior use of bright light therapy * Primary indication for hospitalization is for a disorder other than major depressive disorder (determined by patient's treatment team) * Photosensitive medical conditions or current use of photosensitizing medications - if patients have been advised by a treating clinician at any point to avoid sunlight because of their current medication regimen or medical condition, they will be considered to have a photosensitive medical condition and will be excluded from this study. * Treatment with ECT; if a patient's condition deteriorates during study participation such that the treatment team feels ECT would be in their best interest, they will be withdrawn from study participation. For logistical and transport purposes, the study team feels that exclusion of patients receiving ECT will be necessarily. Additionally, these patients would likely be excluded from a future larger RCT given that ECT would likely interfere with signal of BLT efficacy. * Uncontrolled headaches or any migraines within the last month * Major neurocognitive disorder * Severe intellectual disability * Inability to consent for the study * Active psychosis * Inmates

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Study completion rateUp to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)Percentage of patients who complete the study while psychiatrically hospitalized
Adequacy of allocation blindingUp to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)assessed by the proportion of participants who correctly identify their study arm allocation. Blinding will be considered adequate if the proportion of correct guesses does not significantly exceed chance levels

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item scale (HAMD-17)Day of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6HAMD-17 is a commonly used clinician rating scale for depressive symptoms
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) ScoreDay of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6BDI-II is a commonly used self-report rating scale for depressive symptoms

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026