Skip to content

oPtic Nerve Sheath Evaluation in gianT Cell aRtheritis by UltraSound

oPtic Nerve Sheath Evaluation in gianT Cell aRtheritis by UltraSound

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07001059
Acronym
PETRUS
Enrollment
190
Registered
2025-06-03
Start date
2025-09-04
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2025-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

Keywords

Giant Cell Arteritis, Optic nerve sheath, Ultrasound

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the measure of the optic nerve sheath is a reliable diagnostic marker for giant cell arteritis

Detailed description

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is a vasculitis affecting large and medium-sized vessels. It predominantly occurs in women, with a sex ratio of 3:1, and mainly affects individuals around 70 years of age. GCA is a rare condition, with an incidence of approximately 10 cases per 100,000 people in France. Current recommendations suggest using imaging techniques and/or temporal artery biopsy (TAB) based on the clinical resources available. The key challenge in suspected cases of GCA is to establish a rapid diagnosis. It is important to note that false-negative imaging results may occur if corticosteroid treatment is initiated prior to imaging: after 3 days for PET-CT, 5 to 7 days for Doppler ultrasound, and up to 14 days for TAB. Diagnosing GCA is not always easy and depends on depends on the prompt performance of complementary examinations. Studies have shown that the optic nerve sheath is thickened on ultrasound in patients with GCA. In this context, the investigator aims to evaluate the measurement of the optic nerve sheath via ultrasound for diagnosing GCA. Ultrasound offers a faster, non-invasive, widely available, and cost-effective diagnostic tool.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTorbital ultrasound

orbital ultrasound at the beginning of the participation, and at 6 months after the inclusion.

Sponsors

Hôpital NOVO
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with suspected GCA * Patient over 50 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with history of GCA * Patient with a history of polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR) without initial PET scan * Patient with a history of retinal disease, demyelinating disease, or intracranial hypertension * Use of corticosteroids \> 0.5mg/kg in the last 2 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess whether the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD) measured by orbital ultrasound serves as an effective diagnostic marker for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsArea under the ROC curve (AUC) of the optic nerve sheath measurements obtained by ultrasound during the enrollment phase, using the final clinical expert diagnosis at 6 months as the reference standard. The clinical expert's evaluation will be blinded to the optic nerve sheath measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of ONSD in GCA.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsSensitivity, specificity, ROC curve inflection point (pathological threshold value), positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio.
Study the evolution of ONSD under treatment between M0 and M6 in patients with GCA.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsMeasurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by ultrasound at baseline (within 3 days of corticosteroid initiation) in all patients, and at 6 months in patients with GCA.
Assess the reproducibility of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements by ultrasound.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsMean bias according to Bland-Altman analysis, limits of agreement with their confidence intervals, maximum acceptable difference (clinical and statistical difference calculated using the root sum of squares of the coefficients of variation), inter-rater ICC.
Exploratory evaluation of ONSD based on the presence or absence of GCA with visual involvement.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsComparison of mean ONSD between subgroups: GCA with visual involvement, GCA without visual involvement, and GCA-negative patients
Assess the feasibility of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for GCA.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsDescription of the patient flow : average duration of the exam
Exploratory evaluation of ONSD according to the presence or absence of extracranial GCA.At the patient enrollment visit and at 6 monthsComparison of mean ONSD between subgroups: cranial GCA, extracranial GCA, and GCA-negative patients.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactMaryline DELATTRE
maryline.delattre@ght-novo.fr+330130754131
Backup ContactMathilde WLODARCZYK
mathilde.wlodarczyk@ght-novo.fr+330130754040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026