Skip to content

Bilateral Peribulbar Block for Cataract Surgery

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Peribulbar Block for Cataract Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07000669
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-06-03
Start date
2025-06-03
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bilateral, Cataract Surgery, Efficacy, Peribulbar Block, Safety

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral peribulbar block for cataract surgery.

Detailed description

Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide, with local anesthesia being the preferred method due to its safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Peribulbar anaesthesia has gained popularity due to its relative efficacy in generating ocular akinesia and anaesthesia with a reduced risk of consequences such as optic nerve damage and globe perforation.

Interventions

OTHERBilateral peribulbar block

Patients undergoing bilateral peribulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Both sexes. * American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III. * Patients undergoing cataract surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Infection at the site of the surgery. * Allergy to any of the used drugs. * Coagulopathy. * Posterior staphyloma. * Bronchial asthma. * Bradyarrhythmia. * Pre-existing ocular muscle paresis. * Neurological deficit. * Co-existing inflammatory conditions of eye. * Complicated cataracts. * Previously operated eyes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of painIntraoperativelyThe pain will be evaluated by straightforward questioning using a 3-point scoring method (no pain = 0, discomfort = 1, pain = 2) during the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction24 hours postoperativelyThe point in time to satisfactory surgical anesthesia will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale patient satisfaction (1, extremely dissatisfied; 2, unsatisfied; 3, neutral; 4, satisfied; 5, extremely satisfied)
Grading of AkinesiaIntraoperativelyMotor block will be assessed by estimation of globe akinesia in the four quadrants, discriminated by the 4 directions of the gaze: lateral, medial, superior, and inferior. A 3- point scoring method will be chosen, in which 0 = akinesia, 1 = incomplete akinesia, and 2 = natural movement, with a total score ranging from 0-8 for the four muscles.
Incidence of adverse events24 hours postoperativelyIncidence of adverse events such as coughing, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, arrhythmias, proptosis, globe puncture, or retrobulbar hemorrhage will be recorded.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 25, 2026