Skip to content

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) With Versus Without Hyaluronidase for Hand Surgery

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) With Versus Without Hyaluronidase for Hand Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07000058
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-05-31
Start date
2025-06-20
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand Surgery, Local Infiltration

Keywords

WALANT, Wide-Awake, Hand surgery, Hyaluronidase

Brief summary

The WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) method, introduced by Dr. Donald H. Lalonde over a decade ago, has gained popularity due to its favorable outcomes and patient satisfaction. This technique involves injecting diluted lidocaine and epinephrine, which helps control pain and bleeding without the discomfort of a tourniquet. This research will explore the use of hyaluronidase to enhance the WALANT technique. The study hypothesize that adding hyaluronidase would improve the onset speed and duration of pain control. A double-blinded study involving 100 patients compared WALANT with hyaluronidase (Group A) to WALANT without Hyaluronidase (Group B).

Detailed description

Background: Hand surgery, being one of the most frequent outpatient procedures, remains undecided regarding the ideal anesthesia technique. Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is one of the frequently used anesthesia techniques by some hand surgeons (8%). Objective: The study aims to evaluate the impact of hyaluronidase administration on the onset and persistence of WALANT in hand surgery. Patients and Methods: This Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial will be conducted in Souad Kafafi University Hospital (SKUH), faculty of medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST). One hundred patients (18-60years old) with ASA class I or II who will be scheduled for hand surgery. They will be equally divided into two groups: Group A (n =50) WALANT with hyaluronidase technique: Patients will receive a mixture of hyaluronidase 15 IU to every 1 ml lidocaine 1% mixture. Group B (n =50) WALANT without hyaluronidase technique: Patients will receive a mixture of lidocaine 1%. The infiltrative local anesthesia will be administered at the appropriate site in subcutaneous tissue just deep to the incisional site to produce tumescent local anesthesia. The onset time and duration of postoperative analgesia will be recorded.

Interventions

DRUGHyaluronidase and Lidocaine 1% mixture

in group A hyaluronidase is expected to shorten the onset of action and prolong the duration of action of lidocaine 1% mixture than in group B where lidocaine 1% mixture only will be given

DRUGlidocaine 1 % mixture

lidocaine 1 % mixture includes; A mixture of ( epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine 1% ) buffered by 1 ml of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% for every 10 ml of the local anesthetic mixture.

Sponsors

Misr University for Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All the above selected are blind regarding the used technique of anesthesia

Intervention model description

Two groups of participants will receive WALANT technique; 1. Group A (n=50); WALANT with Hyaluronidase 2. Group B (n=50); WALANT without Hyaluronidase

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* One hundred individuals scheduled for hand surgery * between the ages of 18 and 60 years old, * of both sexes * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II. * were randomized 1:1 to either Group A; (Receiving WALANT with hyaluronidase) or Group B; (Receiving WALANT without hyaluronidase).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women, * patients who refused the terms of the research consent statement, * psychiatric illness, * uncooperative patient, * patients with history of allergy to local anesthetic drugs, * cardiac arrhythmia, * patients with bleeding tendency, * patients with low flow finger perfusion state such as Burger disease and Raynaud's disease, * patients with connective tissue disease such as Scleroderma * suspicious disease with malignancy and hand infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset time of analgesia.from time of drug injection to start time of analgesiatime to start analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of postoperative analgesiafrom onset time of analgesia to end of analgesia time postoperativelyduration of analgesia
Pain intensityfrom start of pain postoperatively till the end of first 24 hours postoperativelyPain intensity measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
The amount of morphine usedFrom start of postoperative pain to end of first 24 hours postoperativelyDose of morphine used for analgesia postoperatively
Amount of bleedingFrom start of surgery to end of sugeryVolume of blood loss
Patient satisfactionFrom start of anesthesia till the end of first 24 hours postoperativelyPatient comfort with the technique

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026