Skip to content

Intravascular Lithotripsy With or Without Rotational Atherectomy for Coronary Calcified Nodule Treatment

Coronary Calcified Nodule Management With Rotational Atherectomy Plus Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy vs. Intravascular Lithotripsy Alone: A Prospective, Randomized Trial (NODULE-SHOCK)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07000045
Acronym
NODULE-SHOCK
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-05-31
Start date
2025-10-06
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Calcification

Keywords

Coronary calcification, Calcified nodule, Intravascular lithotripsy, Rotational atherectomy, Optical coherence tomography, Percutaneous coronary intervention

Brief summary

The NODULE-SHOCK trial is a prospective, investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with or without rotational atherectomy (RA) in patients with coronary calcified nodules (Cohort A), and operator-determined vs maximum IVL pulses in patients with non-nodular severe coronary calcium (Cohort B).

Detailed description

The trial consists of two cohorts: * Patients with calcified nodules (CN) (Cohort A) * Patients with non-nodular severe coronary calcium (Cohort B) Randomization will occur as follows: * Rotational atherectomy followed by intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) or IVL alone for lesion preparation prior to stenting (Cohort A). * Operator-determined or maximum IVL pulses prior to stenting. (Cohort B) The trial is designed to compare two calcium modification strategies in each cohort with regard to the primary endpoints of post-procedural minimum stent area assessed by optical coherence tomography at the CN site (Cohort A) and at the site of maximum calcification (Cohort B).

Interventions

Intravascular lithotripsy device used for calcium modification in coronary lesions, using either operator-determined or maximum pulsed numbers for lesion preparation prior to stenting.

Rotational atherectomy device used to debulk calcified nodules before IVL and stent implantation.

Sponsors

Annapoorna Kini
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants are blinded to treatment allocation. Operators and investigators are unblinded.

Intervention model description

Cohort A: RA + IVL vs IVL alone for calcified nodules Cohort B: Operator-determined IVL pulses vs Maximum IVL pulses for non-CN severe calcium

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years who signed written informed consent * Presence of a clinical indication for coronary intervention * Patients undergoing PCI for a de novo calcified lesion with planned drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation * Native coronary artery with significant stenosis defined as: * ≥70% and \<100% stenosis on angiography, or * 50-70% stenosis with evidence of ischemia (positive stress test, FFR ≤ 0.8, or OCT minimal lumen area (MLA) ≤ 4.0 mm2) * Reference vessel diameter: ≥2.5 mm to ≤ 4.0 mm * Lesion length: ≥5mm * Moderate to severe calcification of the target lesion confirmed by angiography * Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 at baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiogenic shock at the time of procedure * Primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) * Pregnant, nursing, or childbearing potential without adequate contraception * Known allergy or contraindication to DAPT (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) * Planned surgery within 6 months unless DAPT can be maintained * Life expectancy \<12 months due to a serious medical illness (e.g., advanced cancer, end-stage heart failure) * Severe kidney dysfunction (CrCl \<30 mL/min) without dialysis * Concurrent participation in another investigational study * Referral for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after a heart team discussion * Angiographic evidence of thrombus at the target lesion * Angiographic evidence of significant dissection at the treatment site prior to intervention * Lesion with a previously placed stent within 10mm (visual estimate) * Last remaining vessel with severely compromised left ventricular function (LVEF \<30%) * Target lesion within a saphenous vein graft (SVG)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimum stent area (MSA)Immediately after Index procedurePost-procedural minimum stent area measured at the site of the calcified nodule (Cohort A) or the point of maximum calcification (Cohort B), as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target vessel failure (TVF)during hospitalization, approximately 1-2 days, 30 days, and 12 monthsTarget vessel failure (TVF) defined as composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization
Stent thrombosis12 monthsDefinite or probable stent thrombosis according to academic research consortium-2 (ARC-2) definitions. Definite stent thrombosis is defined as the presence of a thrombus within the stent, within 5 mm of the stent edge, or in a side branch of the stented segment, confirmed by angiography or pathology, along with evidence of acute ischemia such as symptoms, ECG changes, or elevated cardiac biomarkers. Probable is defined as a myocardial infarction in the territory of the stented vessel without angiographic confirmation and without another obvious cause.
Device successImmediately after Index procedureSuccessful lesion crossing and device delivery to the target site
Angiographic successImmediately after Index procedureAngiographic success defined as stent deployment with residual stenosis \<30% and TIMI 3 flow without significant angiographic complications (perforation, major dissection, distal embolization, slow flow, or no flow)
Procedural successImmediately after Index procedureProcedural success defined as angiographic success and no in-hospital TVF
Number of Calcium fracturesImmediately after Index procedureNumber and presence of post-IVL calcium fractures identified on OCT
Pre- and post-dilatation ballon sizeImmediately before and after Index procedureBalloon size recorded during lesion preparation and post-dilatation
Pre- and post-dilatation inflation pressureImmediately before and after Index procedureInflation pressure recorded during lesion preparation and post-dilatation
Total number of IVL pulses delivered to the lesion during treatmentIntraoperatively during Index procedureIVL pulse characteristics - Total number of IVL pulses delivered to the lesion during treatment relative to overall lesion length and calcified segment length
Lesion length of IVL pulses deliveredIntraoperatively during Index procedureIVL pulse characteristics - The lesion length over which pulses were applied, relative to overall lesion length and calcified segment length
Bailout or adjunctive calcium modificationIntraoperatively during Index procedureUse of additional calcium modification device beyond initial randomized strategy

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKeisuke Yasumura, MD
keisuke.yasumura@mountsinai.org(212) 241-4181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026