Skip to content

Comparison of Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy in Patients With Ureteral Stones

Comparison of Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy in Patients With Ureteral Stones

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06999135
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-05-31
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-08-15
Last updated
2025-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medical Expulsive Therapy, Silodosin, Tamsulosin

Brief summary

This study compares the effectiveness and side effect profiles of Tamsulosin and Silodosin in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteric stones. Conducted as a randomized control trial at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, 180 patients were analyzed-89 on Tamsulosin and 93 on Silodosin. Results showed that Silodosin had a higher stone expulsion rate, especially within 14 days, and fewer side effects compared to Tamsulosin. Common side effects included orthostatic hypotension, abnormal ejaculation, and headaches, with Silodosin showing a better overall safety profile.

Detailed description

This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial conducted at the Urology Department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, over a period of 12 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and written informed consent was secured from all participants. Participants included adults aged 18 to 60 years with a single, unilateral ureteric stone measuring 5 to 10 mm, confirmed by non-contrast CT scan. Patients with a history of ureteral surgery, congenital anomalies, severe renal impairment (serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL), pregnancy, lactation, urinary tract infection, or those using calcium channel blockers or other alpha-blockers were excluded. A total of 180 eligible patients were randomized into two groups: 89 patients received Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily, while 93 patients received Silodosin 8 mg daily. Both groups received standard analgesia with diclofenac sodium 50 mg as needed and were advised to maintain adequate hydration. Treatment continued until stone expulsion or for a maximum of 28 days. Patients were monitored weekly through clinical evaluation and imaging (ultrasound or X-ray), and adverse events such as dizziness, ejaculatory dysfunction, and headaches were recorded using standardized questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, while categorical variables were assessed with Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Interventions

DRUGSilodosin

Silodosin is an oral medication primarily used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by relaxing the muscles in the prostate and bladder neck to improve urine flow. It belongs to a class of drugs called alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists, which block receptors responsible for muscle contraction in these areas. This action helps relieve symptoms such as difficulty urinating, urgency, and weak urine stream. Silodosin is taken once daily with food and is known for its high selectivity for alpha-1A receptors, contributing to its effectiveness and safety profile

Sponsors

Fatima Jinnah Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between ages 18 years - 55 years. * Solitary unilateral ureteral stone * Stone sizes less than 10 mm measured on non-contrast computed tomography of kidney, ureter and bladder. * Stones being treated primarily with medical expulsive therapy * Radio opaque Stone

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Untreated UTI * Bleeding disorders * Obstruction distal to stone * Serum Creatinine \> 1.3 mg/dl in males and \> 1.2 mg/dl in females. * Congenital renal anomaly/ skeletal malformation * Previous treatment for the same stone (PCNL/ URS / push back) * Solitary Kidney * Prior JJ stent insertion * Bilateral ureteral stone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TIME TO STONE EXPULSION6MONTHSNumber of days from treatment initiation to confirmed stone passage, measured by imaging and patient report.
STONE EXPULSION RATE6 MONTHSThis measure evaluates the proportion of patients who pass ureteral stones within specific time frames (0-14 days, 15-21 days, and 22-28 days) when treated with Silodosin versus Tamsulosin.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Abnormal Ejaculation6 monthsPercentage of patients reporting abnormal ejaculation, assessed via patient questionnaires.
Incidence of Headache Percentage of patients reporting headaches, assessed via patient questionnaires.6 monthsPercentage of patients reporting headaches, assessed via patient questionnaires.
Analgesic Requirement:6 monthsPercentage of patients requiring analgesics during treatment, recorded from prescription or patient report.
Stone Position and Laterality6 months: Distribution of stone location (proximal, mid, distal ureter) and side (right or left), determined by imaging.
Symptom Duration Prior to CT:6 monthsCategorized duration of symptoms before diagnosis, collected from patient history.
Need for Auxiliary Procedures6 monthsPercentage of patients requiring interventions such as ureteroscopy or lithotripsy, documented from clinical records.
INCIDENCE OF ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION6 monthsPercentage of patients experiencing orthostatic hypotension, measured by clinical blood pressure monitoring.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
BMI6 MONTHSMeasurement: Categorized as Normal or Obese based on standard BMI thresholds (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026