Skip to content

Effects of Energy Conservation Techniques With Pursed Lip Breathing on Quality of Life in Bronchiectasis

Combined Effects of Energy Conservation Techniques With Pursed Lip Breathing on Functional Independence and Quality of Life in Bronchiectasis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06995989
Enrollment
46
Registered
2025-05-30
Start date
2025-05-28
Completion date
2025-10-10
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis

Keywords

Bronchiectasis, breathing exercises , Dyspnea

Brief summary

Bronchiectasis is the abnormal dilatation of the bronchi. Due to airway dilatation patient is unable to clear the mucus and risk of infection is increased. For mucus clearance used many breathing techniques employed along with or without mechanical devices. Many researches have shown the inconsistent results of energy conservation techniques along with breathing exercises among variety of cardiopulmonary disorders. This study will be conducted to determine the combined effects of energy conservation techniques with pursed lip breathing on functional independence and quality of life in patients of bronchiectasis. It will be a randomized clinical trial. Two groups will be taken under the age of 40 to 60 years and data will be collected from pulmonary wards of selected hospitals. Sample size will be 46 keeping the attrition rate 10%. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) will be used to evaluate the quality of life of patients and 6 mint walk test is used to determine functional independence of bronchiectasis patients. After data collection, data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.

Detailed description

Bronchiectasis is the abnormal dilatation of the bronchi. Due to airway dilatation patient is unable to clear the mucus and risk of infection is increased. For mucus clearance and reduced labored breathing, conventional chest physiotherapy is used in which many breathing techniques can be employed along with or without mechanical devices and inspiratory muscle training, coughing support and positioning to improve the respiratory functions but there is no consensus on which breathing technique is better. Many researches have shown the inconsistent results of energy conservation techniques along with breathing exercises among variety of cardiopulmonary disorders such as in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients but no results were seen among patients of bronchiectasis. This study will be conducted to determine the combined effects of energy conservation techniques with pursed lip breathing on functional independence and quality of life in patients of bronchiectasis. It will be a randomized clinical trial. Age of selected subjects will be between 40 to 60 years and data will be collected from pulmonary wards of selected hospitals. Sample size will be 46 keeping the attrition rate 10%. There will be 2 groups i.e. group A will receive energy conservation techniques along with pursed lip breathing technique and group B will receive only pursed lip breathing technique. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) will be used to evaluate the quality of life of patients and 6 mint walk test is used to determine functional independence of bronchiectasis patients. After data collection, data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.

Interventions

OTHERenergy conservation techniques with pursed lip breathing

Group A will receive energy conservation techniques with pursed lip breathing with 1 session a day for total 5 days in a week. 1 session will consist of 3 cycles of pursed lip breathing for duration of 10 minutes with a break of 20 minutes in between. ECTs will be trained for 2 weeks. A detailed manual will be developed to ensure the consistency of the training for all subjects. Examples of interventions are training to use ergonomic principles along with pursed lip breathing. The subjects were trained to place their equipment at chest height; they were trained to work at paced speed and in some cases instructed to use technical aids.

pursed lip breathing

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 46 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both genders, aged between 40 to 60 years Bronchiectasis

Exclusion criteria

* Prior history of open-heart surgery * Prior severe pulmonary/hepatic or renal disease * Life-threatening arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation) * Pulmonary complications (atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), diaphragmatic injury) * Congestive heart failure * Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) * Any known psychological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)2 weeksPatients completed on paper the SGRQ, it includes dimensions for SGRQ activity, SGRQ impact, SGRQ symptoms, and SGRQ total. The scale ranges from 0 (excellent quality of life) to 100 (worst quality of life) for all four dimensions
6 Minutes walk test2 weeksThe patient is asked to walk as far as possible along a 30-m minimally trafficked corridor for a period of 6 min with the primary outcome measure being the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) measured in meters

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary Contactimran amjad, phd
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026