Skip to content

Comparative Study on Different Bone Reconstruction After Chest Wall Tumor Resection

Comparative Study on the Effect of New Reconstruction Methods and Traditional Reconstruction Methods on Bone Reconstruction After Chest Wall Tumor Resection

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06994533
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-05-29
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chest Wall Tumor

Brief summary

Chest wall tumors are one of the important diseases in thoracic surgery, and surgery is still the main treatment for this disease in clinical practice. Surgery for chest wall tumors requires extensive resection. However, the extensive chest wall defect formed after extensive resection can lead to the destruction of the integrity and stability of the chest wall, thus requiring chest wall reconstruction. The reconstruction of the chest wall after resection has always been a difficult point in chest wall tumor surgery, and the reconstruction of the chest wall bone is a key point in chest wall reconstruction. The goals of successful chest wall bone reconstruction include restoring chest wall rigidity, minimizing chest wall deformities, maintaining lung mechanics, and protecting thoracic organs. At present, traditional reconstruction methods are based on simulating and restoring the anatomical structure of the thoracic spine. For certain special areas of chest wall defects (such as posterior rib and paraspinal tumors), it is difficult to perform residual fixation; At the same time, traditional reconstruction methods suffer from insufficient stability after reconstruction, such as loosening, detachment, displacement, and even fracture. Therefore, it is necessary to design new chest wall reconstruction methods to meet clinical needs.

Detailed description

Chest wall tumors are one of the important diseases in thoracic surgery, and surgery is still the main treatment for this disease in clinical practice. Surgery for chest wall tumors requires the adoption of appropriate treatment plans based on the pathological results of the tumor, the location of tumor growth, the degree of local invasion of the tumor, and the presence of metastasis at the time of tumor detection. More importantly, surgical resection of primary malignant tumors of the chest wall should be carried out under careful planning, as most patients only have one chance of cure, and it becomes very difficult to undergo reoperation after tumor recurrence or surgical failure. Moreover, even if these patients undergo reoperation, their prognosis is also poor. To ensure the thoroughness of the surgery, it is usually necessary to perform an extensive resection of the chest wall tumor. However, the extensive chest wall defect formed after extensive resection can lead to the destruction of the integrity and stability of the chest wall, and if not handled properly, adverse consequences may occur. If chest wall softening, abnormal breathing, and acute respiratory failure occur early after surgery, it will affect the therapeutic effect of the surgery; In the late postoperative period, chest wall deformities, pulmonary hernias, chronic respiratory dysfunction, and even scoliosis may occur, affecting the quality of life. The reconstruction of the chest wall after resection has always been a difficult point in chest wall tumor surgery, and the reconstruction of the chest wall bone is a key point in chest wall reconstruction. The goals of successful chest wall bone reconstruction include restoring chest wall rigidity, minimizing chest wall deformities, maintaining lung mechanics, and protecting thoracic organs. In clinical treatment, it has been found that traditional reconstruction methods are unable to perform residual fixation for certain special areas of chest wall defects (such as posterior rib paravertebral tumors); There are also defects in the stability of the reconstructed implant, such as loosening, detachment, displacement, and even fracture. Therefore, it is necessary to design new chest wall reconstruction methods to meet clinical needs.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmethods on bone reconstrucion after chest wall tumor resection

Selecting appropriate implants for chest wall bone reconstruction

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-70 years old, male or female not limited 2. Anesthesia ASA score I-II 3. Malignant tumor of soft tissue in the chest 4. Malignant tumors of ribs, rib cartilage, and sternum 5. Tumors with uncertain or unknown properties of ribs, rib cartilage, and sternum 6. Giant benign tumors of ribs, rib cartilage, and sternum 7. The preoperative examination results indicate that the tumor has not undergone distant metastasis 8. Willing to participate in the research and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with distant metastasis detected during preoperative examination 2. Inoperable tumor 3. During the examination, it was discovered that the patient had another type of malignant tumor present 4. ECOG 4 5. Suffering from active or chronic fungal/bacterial/viral infections 6. History of allergy to anesthesia related drugs 7. Heart and lung dysfunction, liver and kidney dysfunction, inability to tolerate surgery 8. Patients with mental disorders who are unable to cooperate with treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stability of implants3 yearsThe occurrence of detachment, displacement, and fracture of implants during follow-up in patients undergoing chest wall tumor surgery after receiving a new reconstruction method

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative physical function status3 yearsKarnofsky scoring scale
Respiratory discomfort3 yearsPatient's respiratory discomfort in a calm state or walking state, measured as mild, moderate, or sereve after reconstruction surgery
Postoperative complications3 yearsPulmonary infection, atelectasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, postoperative drainage tube removal time, length of hospital stay
Quality of life3 yearsEQ-5D-5L scoring scale, postoperative chronic pain level, postoperative recovery of daily work, postoperative changes in lung function (forced vital capacity FVC, first second forced vital capacity FEV1)
Complications of implants3 yearsFracture, displacement, infection, and compatibility of implants
Postoperative recovery of daily work3 yearsThe time from the day of surgery to the resumption of normal work, postoperative changes in lung function (forced vital capacity FVC, first second forced vital capacity FEV1)
Postoperative changes in lung function3 yearsFVC(forced vital capacity FVC) and FEV1(first second forced vital capacity)at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery
chest wall discomfort in patients after reconstruction surgery3 yearsPatient chest wall discomfort in a calm or walking state, measured as mild, moderate, or severe after reconstrcution surgery
Chest wall appearance after reconstruction surgery3 yearsThe degree of recovery of chest wall appearance after surgery is evaluated based on three criteria: satisfactory, moderately satisfactory, and unsatisfactory.
Postoperative chronic pain3 yearsNRS(Numberical rating scale), postoperative recovery of daily work, postoperative changes in lung function (forced vital capacity FVC, first second forced vital capacity FEV1)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026