Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation of the Thermal Protection Provided by Submarine Rescue Suits: Half Suit Versus Full Suit

Comparative Evaluation of the Thermal Protection Provided by Submarine Rescue Suits: Half Suit Versus Full Suit

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06992050
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-05-28
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cold Exposure, Hypothermia, Thermal Insulation, Immersion Suits, Submarine Evacuation

Brief summary

This study evaluated the thermal and functional performance of full-body versus half-body Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment (SEIE) suits during cold water immersion (\ 16.5°C) and raft sitting. Twenty submariners were divided into two groups.

Detailed description

This study investigates the performance of full-body versus half-body Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment (SEIE) suits under conditions simulating submarine emergencies in cold water (\ 16.5°C). In such scenarios, rapid evacuation and prolonged exposure to cold water pose significant risks of hypothermia and impaired physical function. The aim was to assess and compare the thermal insulation and motor performance effects of both suit designs during water immersion and raft sitting. Twenty healthy active-duty submariners (age 22 ± 1 years) participated, divided evenly into two groups (full suit vs. half suit). Core temperature was monitored using ingestible sensors, and subjective cold sensation was assessed regularly throughout immersion and raft sitting. Additional outcome measures included fine motor dexterity (assembling shackles) and handgrip strength, recorded before and after exposure. The experimental protocol involved one session per participant. Anthropometric data were collected, and subjects underwent a controlled immersion and raft sitting protocol using calibrated thermal equipment. Motor function tasks were standardized and repeated to control for learning effects. Statistical analysis included non-parametric repeated measures tests with appropriate corrections for multiple comparisons.

Interventions

DEVICESubmariner suit

Participants wearing full-body Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment (SEIE) suits

Sponsors

Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy active-duty submariners Male participants aged 20-25 years No history of cardiovascular, respiratory, or neurological disorders Not acclimatized to cold environments or cold water exposure Provided written informed consent Medically cleared for cold water immersion by a physician prior to participation -

Exclusion criteria

History of cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders Regular exposure to cold environments or cold water (cold-acclimatized individuals) Use of medications that could affect thermoregulation or neuromuscular function Any skin conditions that may be aggravated by cold water immersion Inability to provide informed consent Failure to pass pre-exposure medical examination by a study physician \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core temperaturetwo hoursCore temp. measured with telemetric pills

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective cold sensation -two hoursAssessed using a standardized cold discomfort scale during immersion and raft sitting.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026