Carious Anteriors, Carious Primary
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical success of injectable composite versus packable composite in restoration of primary anteriors.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALInjectable composite resin restoration
Injectable composite Beautifil flow Plus X (Shofu INC., Koyoto, Japan)
BIOLOGICALpackable composite
Packable Composite Beautifil II (Shofu INC., Koyoto, Japan)
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
Patients will be recruited from outpatient clinic of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University. Patients will be carefully assessed for eligibility to participate in our study then a full explanation of the nature of our experiment will be provided for parents or guardian before obtaining the informed consent from them.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Children with caries in primary anterior teeth. * Caries involving class III, IV, V or multisurface caries * Restorable anterior teeth * Pre operative Radiograph showing at least half of the root is not resorbed).
Exclusion criteria
* Badly decayed non restorable anterior teeth * Signs and symptoms of root resorption (more than half the root is resorbed) * Presence of bony resorption * Presence of pathological root resorption * Tooth Mobility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Clinical Assessment of Restoration | through study completion, on average of 1 year | Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Ryge Criteria Outcome name: Marginal integrity Measuring Device: Explorer Measuring unit: Alpha (A) There is no visible evidence of ditching along the margin of the restoration. Bravo (B) There is visible evidence of ditching along the margin of the restoration, it is not extending to the dentino-enamel junction. Charlie (C) There is dentin or base is exposed along the margin of the restoration. Delta (D) The restoration is mobile, fractured, or missing. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parents' patient Satisfaction | immediately after the intervention/procedure | Measuring Device: Questionnaire Measuring unit: Binary (yes or No) |
| Chair side time | immediately after the intervention/procedure | Measuring Device: Stopwatch Measuring unit: Minutes |
| Plaque accumulation | through study completion, on average of 1 year | Measuring Device: Plaque index Score by Probe Measuring unit: 0 : No plaque 1. : A film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth. The plaque may be seen in situ only by using the probe on the tooth surface. 2. : Moderate accumulation of soft deposits within the gingival pocket, or the tooth and gingival margin which can be seen with the naked eye. 3. : Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactBassant Mohamed ElMesbahy
Outcome results
None listed