Skip to content

Effects of Aphasia Identification Cards on Service Workers' Comprehension of People With Aphasia

Effects of Aphasia Identification Cards on Comprehension of Aphasic Language by Unfamiliar Communication Partners

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06990997
Acronym
PAUSE
Enrollment
160
Registered
2025-05-25
Start date
2025-09-22
Completion date
2027-02-28
Last updated
2026-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphasia

Keywords

Aphasia, Communication partner, Service worker, Language processing, Language comprehension, aphasia identification card, eye-tracking

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether healthy volunteers are more successful at understanding people with aphasia if they have first viewed an aphasia identification (ID) card. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Does viewing an aphasia ID card improve healthy volunteers' understanding of the language errors made by people with aphasia? * Does viewing an aphasia ID card improve healthy volunteers' understanding of people with aphasia who make long pauses in their speech? Researchers will compare aphasia ID cards to a control condition (no ID card) to see whether aphasia ID cards improve healthy volunteers' understanding. Healthy volunteers will visit the study site for a single session (about 2 hours long). During the session they will: * Complete brief tests of their vision, hearing and thinking * Listen to sentences produced by a speaker with aphasia while their eye movements are recorded * Complete a survey about the experience of listening to the speaker with aphasia

Detailed description

People with aphasia often experience challenges conveying their thoughts to unfamiliar communication partners, which is critical for living independently and building new social connections. This line of research has two long-term objectives: to improve unfamiliar communication partners' comprehension of people with aphasia, and to support people with aphasia in advocating for their communication needs. This project addresses these goals with a focus on service workers, who interact directly with customers to provide goods, services, or information. Being understood by service workers is often necessary to complete essential tasks such as purchasing food and picking up medication. This project investigates whether service workers comprehend speakers with aphasia more accurately when they have first read an aphasia identification (ID) card. Aphasia ID cards contain written self-advocacy statements that disclose the speaker's aphasia, define aphasia, and provide guidance on how to communicate successfully. These statements have been shown to improve unfamiliar communication partners' attitudes (knowledge about aphasia, emotions, and behavior), which improves communication experiences for people with aphasia. This project tests the central hypothesis that, by improving unfamiliar communication partners' attitudes, aphasia ID cards facilitate key language processes that improve their comprehension of people with aphasia. This randomized controlled trial will enroll 160 service workers. Half of the service workers will view an aphasia ID card for a speaker with aphasia, and half will not. Then, all service workers will complete tasks measuring their attitudes, language processing, and comprehension of service requests (i.e., requests for goods, services, or information) produced by speakers with aphasia. Eye-tracking will be used to measure key language processes that take place while service workers listen to the service requests. The Specific Aims are to investigate how viewing an aphasia ID card affects service workers' attitudes, language processing, and comprehension when people with aphasia produce long pauses (Aim 1) and paraphasias (word-retrieval errors) (Aim 2). By rigorously investigating the effects of aphasia ID cards on service workers' attitudes, language processing, and comprehension, this project will contribute to the long-term goals of improving unfamiliar communication partners' comprehension and helping people with aphasia self-advocate effectively.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAphasia identification (ID) card

Participants will view an aphasia ID card for a speaker with aphasia. The card will disclose the speaker's aphasia, define aphasia, and request time to communicate.

Sponsors

University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult age 18-59 * Currently employed as a service worker * Understand spoken and written English well * High school diploma or equivalency * Normal vision or corrected vision with glasses or contact lenses

Exclusion criteria

* Language disorder * Hearing impairment * Intellectual disability * History of acquired neurological disorder (e.g., stroke or moderate/severe brain injury)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comprehension accuracy for sentences with long pauses in the Service Request Comprehension Task5 minutes post-interventionPercent correct mouse-click responses on the Service Request Comprehension Task for sentences with long pauses. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Comprehension accuracy for sentences with paraphasias in the Service Request Comprehension Task5 minutes post-interventionPercent correct mouse-click responses on the Service Request Comprehension Task for sentences with paraphasias (word-retrieval errors). The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual attention during long pauses in the Service Request Comprehension Task5 minutes post-interventionMean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at task-relevant pictures during long pauses, indicating attention to task. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Linguistic integration of words immediately following long pauses in the Service Request Comprehension Task5 minutes post-interventionMean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at the target picture during words immediately following long pauses, indicating linguistic integration of those words. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Implicit repair of paraphasias in the Service Request Comprehension Task5 minutes post-interventionMean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at the target picture in the 1000 ms following paraphasias (word-retrieval errors), indicating implicit repair of the speaker's errors. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Rating of own patience on the Attitude Survey0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-interventionRating scale, 0-100 scale with question "When listening to the speaker, I felt \_\_\_\_\_", with endpoints of "impatient" on the zero side and "patient" on the 100 side. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.
Rating of speaker with aphasia's intelligence on the Attitude Survey0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-interventionRating scale, 0-100 scale with question "I think that the speaker is \_\_\_\_\_", with endpoints of "unintelligent" on the zero side and "intelligent" on the 100 side. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.
Rating of speaker with aphasia's language skills on the Attitude Survey0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-interventionRating scale, 0-100 scale with question "I think that it was \_\_\_\_\_ for the speaker to find the words for what they wanted to say", with endpoints of "hard" on the zero side and "easy" on the 100 side. Lower scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJennifer E Mack, PhD
jemack@umass.edu4135458468
CONTACTHolly Laws, PhD
hlaws@umass.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer Mack, PhD

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026