Skip to content

Accuracy of Computer Guided Implant Placement in Edentulous Mandible A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Computer Guided Implant Placement in Edentulous Mandible A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06990360
Enrollment
5
Registered
2025-05-25
Start date
2017-05-20
Completion date
2024-09-20
Last updated
2025-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge In Mandible

Keywords

Computer-guided implant placement, Edentulous mandible, 3D printed surgical guide

Brief summary

Five stryofoam mandibles were included in this study to assess the accuracy of using computer guided surgical stent in placement of dental implants. The mandibles were CBCT scanned and imported to 3diagnosys software to implant planning. 8 implants were placed in each mandible virtually, 4 anterior implants and 4 posterior implants were placed. The plan was exported as STL file to be imported to the CAD software for designing of the stent. The surgical stent is printed using Micro DGP printer and invision tec e-shell 600 clear resin was used. Stainless steel sleeves were placed in the surgical guide then placed in ethanol 99% to remove the excess monomer. The stent in placed over the mandible and sequential drilling was done until the desired osteotomies width was approached followed by the placement of the implants. Post-operative CBCT was done for the mandible including the implants to assess the accuracy, angulation and position of the placed implants

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCBCT Scanning

The Styrofoam mandibles were scanned using CBCT, which was performed for each mandible pre-operatively, the raw DICOM data set obtained from the CBCT scanning were imported to a special third-party software\* for secondary reconstruction.

Sponsors

Eslam Nashaat Saied Ahmed Mohamed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Five styrofoam mandibles

Exclusion criteria

* no fractures or pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mesiodistal (MD) Angle1 yearmeasures in the software in degrees

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026