Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)
Conditions
Keywords
ventricular tachycardia, radioablation
Brief summary
Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with structural heart disease. Despite the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and radiofrequency catheter ablation, VT recurrence rates remain high-reaching up to 66% in some series. For patients with refractory VT who are not candidates for further ablation or surgical interventions, there is a significant unmet need for novel, effective, and non-invasive treatment options. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has recently emerged as a promising approach for treating ventricular arrhythmias through a technique known as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR). Preliminary studies, including a phase I/II clinical trial, have demonstrated a substantial reduction in VT burden-up to 99.9%-following treatment, with an acceptable safety profile. Reported adverse events have included manageable pericardial effusion, radiation-induced pericarditis, and pneumonitis. The growing body of evidence supports STAR as a feasible and effective alternative for selected patients with treatment-resistant VT. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy as a non-invasive ablation technique for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with refractory arrhythmias in whom conventional therapies have failed. This is a retrospective observational study aimed at comparing outcomes between patients who received stereotactic radioablation and those who did not. A matched-pair analysis will be used to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics and ensure comparability between groups.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), as previously defined * Age greater than 18 years * Presence of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for follow-up * Not eligible for heart transplantation * Estimated life expectancy of at least 1 year * Ability to provide autonomous, informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
* ICD interrogation demonstrating polymorphic VT * Patients with INTERMACS class more than 4 * Patients with LVADs * Patients with active neoplastic disease under oncological treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in VT episode frequency compared to the pretreatment period | Starting from three months before treatment until 3 months later | The number of VT episodes during the 3 months prior to treatment will be compared to the number of episodes recorded during the 3-month period following the post-treatment blanking period. This comparison will help determine whether the treatment provides clinical benefits even at an early stage |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in antiarrhythmic drug burden compared to the baseline | 36 months | The study aims to show whether radioablation treatment is associated with a significant reduction in the use of antiarrhythmic drugs compared to patients who did not undergo the procedure |
| Change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume compared to the baseline | 36 months | Improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume, as assessed through specific tests performed by a cardiologist specializing in arrhythmology, especially the Echocardiogram, and a global electrophysiological evaluation |
| Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume compared to the baseline | 36 months | Improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume , as assessed through specific tests performed by a cardiologist specializing in arrhythmology , especially the Echocardiogram, and a global electrophysiological evaluation |
Countries
Italy