Skip to content

T-cell Therapy in Patients With PML

CurePML - Allogeneic HPyV-2-specific T-cell Therapy in Patients With Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06990087
Enrollment
23
Registered
2025-05-25
Start date
2026-02-06
Completion date
2027-11-01
Last updated
2026-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Progressive Multifocal Leucoencephalopathy (PML)

Brief summary

There is no approved standard treatment für progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The sponsor of the study is developing a new treatment. For this reason, the investigational medicinal product (IMP) called 'human allogenic HPyV-2-specific T cells' is to be tested in this study. The sponsor wants to find out whether the IMP is safe, influences the neurological status and improves the quality of the life of patients . It is to be investigated whether the IMP can be used to treat the disease and whether it could have an advantage over the standard therapy in terms of survival rate.

Detailed description

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe infection of the central nervous system (CNS) caused by reactivation of human polyoma virus 2 (HPyV-2). HPyV-2 usually produces asymptomatic, lifelong persistent or latent infection in the general population. However, in patients with long lasting and profound impairment of cellular immunity, HPyV-2 can reactivate from latency leading to lytic infection of CNS glial cells and thus to encephalitis PML. PML is usually fatal or at least associated with severe disability which makes it a relevant target for the search of appropriate therapeutic options. The investigational medicinal products (IMPs) under test are fresh and cryopreserved allogeneic HPyV-2-specific T-lymphocyte apheresis concentrates. Each patient will receive one HPyV-2-specific T-lymphocyte fresh product and two additional cryopreserved products from the same manufacture with the same dose 2 and 6 weeks after baseline, respectively. This is the first controlled clinical trial to treat patients suffering from PML with this specific methodology of T-cell therapy. The currently available evidence of safety and efficacy is only based on a small series of individual cases treated on a compassionate use basis. This study aims to generate data on safety and first evidence of efficacy within a standardized clinical trial protocol complying to ICH-GCP principles.

Interventions

DRUGApplication of T-lymphocytes

Dosage form: Infusion; Route of administration: Intravenous; Cell dose: 1-2 x 10.000 viable CD3+ T-lymphocytes per kg bodyweight; Application at three timepoints: baseline, after two weeks, after 6 weeks

Sponsors

Hannover Medical School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults\* aged ≥ 18 years with PML (diagnosed ≤ 60 days before screening) associated with one or more of the following risk factors: lymphoproliferative diseases, immunosuppressive therapy, or lymphopenia * Signed written informed consent from subject and/or legal representative * HPyV-2 detection in CSF by PCR analysis or in brain biopsy

Exclusion criteria

* PML caused by HIV * PML caused by natalizumab * PML occurring within five 5 years after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or CAR T cell therapy, or resulting from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) * Patients who are unable to follow the study protocol, either on their own or with the support of a reliable representative, will be excluded * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Currently receiving chemotherapy * Present (within 2 weeks before screening visit) and continuous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition therapy * Severe infections other than PML (e.g. sepsis, pneumonia) * Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the medications used * Inability to undergo MRI examination (e.g. implanted incompatible medical devices, claustrophobia) * Participation in another clinical trial (other investigational drugs or devices at the time of enrolment or within 30 days prior to enrolment)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demonstrate efficacy of treatment6 months after diagnosisDetermine proportion of patients surviving 6 months (overall survival) since diagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety assessmentDuring 12 months from baselineRecording of AEs, SAEs, AE of special interest (GvHD, allergic reactions).
Assessment of potential inflammatory safety concernsDuring 6 months from baselineLaboratory examination of differential blood count (cells/microliter).
Safety assessment of potential electrolyte imbalanceDuring 6 months from baselineLaboratory examination of potassium, sodium (mmol/l).
Safety assessment of potential renal dysfunctionDuring 6 months from baselineLaboratory examination of creatinine (micromol/l).
Safety assessment of potential liver dysfunctionDuring 6 months from baselineLaboratory examination of aspartate aminotransferase (AST; U/l), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; U/l).
Safety assessment of potential coagulation disorderDuring 6 months from baselineLaboratory examination of coagulation parameters (prothrombin time (INR; ratio).
Rate of development of IRISDuring 6 months from baselineEvaluate possible development of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) by MRI of the brain and clinical examination.
Assessment of neurological status by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)Change from baseline after 6 monthsmRS compromising 6 levels of degree of impairment (minimum 0 = no symptoms, maximum 6 = death).
Assessment of neurological status by Karnofsky Performance Status IndexChange from baseline after 6 monthsKarnofsky Performance Status Index compromising 11 levels of functional impairment (minimum 100% = no symptoms, maximum 0% = death).
Assessment of neurological status by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Change from baseline after 6 monthsMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) compromising 8 categories to detect cognitive impairment (minimum 0 points, maximum 30).
Determine change in viral loadChange from baseline after 6 monthsHPyV-2 viral load in CSF quantified by PCR.
Evaluation of quality of life improvements by quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Change from baseline after 6 monthsQuality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) compromising 5 categories to determine quality of life (minimum 0%, maximum 100%).
Analysis of immunological responseChange from baseline after 6 monthsHPyV-2specific -T-lymphocyte frequency in blood detected by IFN-gamma cytokine secretion.
Determine lesion volumeChange from baseline after 6 monthsDetermine lesion volume on brain MRI.
Evaluation of survivalAt month 12Evaluation of survival by telephone interview.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTThomas Skripuletz, Prof. Dr.
skripuletz.thomas@mh-hannover.de+49 511 532

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026