Skip to content

Physiotherapy in Emergency Department for Acute Lumbar Spasm

The Role of Physiotherapy in the Management of Acute Lumbar Spasm in Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06987656
Acronym
PT-ED
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-05-23
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Low Back Pain, Emergency Care, Musculoskeletal Pain

Keywords

Physiotherapy, Acute Low Back Spasm, Emergency Department, Manual Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Pain Management

Brief summary

This retrospective observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions-such as manual therapy, electrotherapy (TENS), and individualized exercise programs-in managing acute lumbar spasm in patients presenting to the emergency department. By analyzing medical records from January to June 2024 at Düzce University Faculty of Medicine, the study will compare outcomes between patients receiving only pharmacological treatment and those receiving additional physiotherapy. Primary outcomes include changes in pain levels (measured by Visual Analog Scale), medication usage, patient satisfaction, and re-admission rates within an 8-week follow-up period. The findings aim to inform the integration of physiotherapy into emergency care protocols for acute lumbar spasm.

Detailed description

This retrospective observational study investigates the role of physiotherapy in managing acute lumbar spasm in emergency department settings. The study will review medical records of 100 patients aged 18 to 65 who presented to Düzce University Faculty of Medicine Emergency Department between January and June 2024 with non-specific acute low back spasm. Patients will be divided into two groups based on documented treatment: (1) those receiving pharmacological treatment only, and (2) those receiving both pharmacological and physiotherapy interventions. Physiotherapy interventions include spinal mobilization, myofascial release, TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation), and individualized exercise protocols. Primary outcomes include changes in pain intensity (measured by Visual Analog Scale), medication consumption, re-admission rates within 8 weeks, and overall patient satisfaction. The study also incorporates a cost analysis based on national reimbursement tariffs (SUT) to evaluate the financial impact of integrating physiotherapy into emergency care. This study does not involve any direct intervention, and data are collected exclusively from existing electronic health records. Ethical approval has been obtained. The findings are expected to guide future protocols involving the integration of physiotherapy into emergency departments in Turkey.

Interventions

DRUGStandard Pharmacologic Treatment

Standard pharmacologic management including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants (e.g., thiocolchicoside), and analgesics (e.g., paracetamol, tramadol) for acute lumbar spasm.

Physiotherapy interventions included spinal mobilization (Maitland techniques), myofascial release, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and personalized exercise programs, as documented in patient medical records.

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
CollaboratorOTHER
Duzce University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged between 18 and 65 years * Presented to the emergency department with non-specific acute lumbar spasm * No serious pathology on initial evaluation (e.g., infection, malignancy, fracture) * No contraindications to physiotherapy or physical activity * Agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent (if applicable in prospective cases)

Exclusion criteria

* History of chronic low back pain * Presence of neurological deficits (e.g., paresis, paralysis) * Diagnosed with serious medical conditions such as infection, malignancy, or spondylodiscitis * Pregnancy or contraindications related to reproductive health * History of spinal surgery within the past year * Cognitive or physical impairments limiting treatment participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) From Admission to DischargeVAS score (0-10 scale)At Emergency Department Admission and at Time of Discharge (up to 12 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of Patient Satisfaction Recorded at DischargeAt Discharge (within 12 hours of Emergency Department Admission)Patient satisfaction levels will be assessed using standardized satisfaction forms documented in the electronic medical record system at the time of discharge. Data will be extracted retrospectively and categorized as satisfied, neutral, or dissatisfied, based on the available hospital documentation.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026