Pediatric Brain Tumor, Pediatric Spine Tumor
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to investigate a neurologic exam scale to provide an objective and more standard way to assess tumor response in pediatric patients with brain and spinal cord tumors.
Detailed description
This study is designed to evaluate inter-observer variability of the pNANO scale when implemented during routine clinic visits for pediatric brain and spine tumor patients. Typically, during a routine clinic visit for patients with pediatric brain and spine tumors, a neurological examination is completed and documented by a provider in clinic notes under the section 'Physical examination', sub-heading 'Neurologic examination.' For this study, every participant will have neurologic examinations performed by 2 or 3 (if feasible), separate providers on the same day (patient's scheduled provider and one or two additional providers from the Study Team), during a scheduled, routine clinic visit(s). To allow for potential significant discrepancies in exams between two providers, if feasible, a third provider will complete an examination at each visit. Each provider will independently perform the neurologic examination and will document the findings on the pNANO scale scorecard. Each provider will also record the amount of time it took to complete their neurologic examination. The providers will not communicate with each other about the findings and will be completely blinded to each other's evaluations. The pNANO scale will be completed at a second clinic visit, between 1-6 months out from the initial assessment. Telemedicine visit evaluations will be allowed for 20% of patients enrolled on study to assess if this scale is feasible via telemedicine. For telemedicine visits, one provider will need to be in clinic to complete the first examination and the second provider will be virtual to complete the second examination on the same day. A third provider would need to be in clinic to complete an examination. For the second evaluation 1-6 months after the first, the same will apply, one or two providers in clinic to complete the first examination while the second/third provider will be virtual. Providers can include physicians and advanced practice providers of any subspecialty: neurology, hematology-oncology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTpNANO Assessment
pNANO assesses patient gait, strength, cerebellar function, visual fields, visual acuity, facial strength, level of consciousness, extraocular movement, dysarthria, and dysphagia The patient will be assessed by 2-3 different clinicians during each of 2 visits.
Sponsors
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* greater than or equal to 1 year old * must be seen in the pediatric clinic * Radiographic or histologic confirmation of a brain or spine tumor at the time of initial diagnosis * Patient or parent/guardian must be able to understand the consent and be willing to sign a written informed consent document according to institutional guidelines.
Exclusion criteria
* none specified
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-observer Variability in pNANO Scores: Difference in Mean Cumulative Scores | Visit 1 (baseline), Visit 2 (up to 6 months) | The Pediatric Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (pNANO) is scored in multiple domains: - strength, level of consciousness, and gait domains (each individually scored 0-3) * facial strength, cerebellar function, visual fields, extraocular movements, dysphagia, and dysarthria domains (each individually scored 0-2) * visual acuity domain scored from 0-1 If summed, cumulative scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (inability to function in each relevant domain) Investigators will explore variability across all domains. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility: Clinical Exams that may correlate with pNANO scores | Visit 1 (baseline), Visit 2 (up to 6 months) | Investigators will explore whether pNANO scores (individual domains or cumulative scores) correlate with clinical exams. |
| Feasibility: Inter-observer variability of pNANO scores between in clinic visits and Telemedicine reported as Difference in Mean Cumulative Scores | Visit 1 (baseline), Visit 2 (up to 6 months) | A subset of participants (approximately 20%) will be assessed remotely to study any impact telemedicine has on pNANO scoring. If summed, cumulative scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (inability to function in each relevant domain). Investigators will explore variability across all domains. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTCancer Connect
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAustin Stuckert, MD
UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Outcome results
None listed