Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy of IV Dexamethasone vs. Nebulized Terbutaline for Renal Colic Pain in the ED

Increment Value of Intravenous Dexametasone Versus Nebulized Terbutaline for Renal Colic Pain Management in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06980727
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-05-20
Start date
2026-08-08
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Colic

Keywords

Renal Colic, Dexamethasone

Brief summary

Adult patients (18-55 years of age) with clinical diagnosis of acute renal colic (sudden sharp colic flank pain with or without radiation to genitalia or groin and with or without urinary symptoms) who had pain score of 5 or more measured by 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS), will be included. Will be excluded those who had history of cardiovascular, hepatic, renal or metabolic diseases, patients with evidence of sepsis or clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection, hemodynamically unstable patients (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg), patients with uncontrolled diabetes, pregnancy, breastfeeding, patients unable to understand verbal and/or written information, patients receiving analgesics within 6 hours before presentation, serum potassium less than 3.7 mmol/l, concomitant use of any beta blockers (including beta-blocker containing eye drops), prolonged-release long-acting β-agonists, use of short-acting β2-agonists within the 6 h preceding presentation to the emergency department, any contraindication to the use of terbutaline, history of drug dependence or chronic consumption of alcohol. Will be also excluded patients with known allergy to paracetamol or terbutaline, patients with abdominal tenderness as a sign of peritoneal inflammation and those with any clinical suspicion for diseases other than urolithiasis, including abdominal aortic aneurysm or dissection.

Interventions

DRUGTerbutaline 2.5 mg

In this study group, patients will receive 1000mg intravenous injection of paracetamol in combination with 4ml IV normal saline as placebo, and 5mg terbutaline in 5ml nebulisation during 10min.

DRUGDexamethasone

Patients will receive 1000mg intravenous injection of paracetamol in combination with 4ml of 2ml intravenous dexamethasone (8mg) and 2 ml of saline sérum, and 5ml nebulisation of of normal saline during 10min as placebo.

DRUGPlacebo

Patients will receive 1000mg intravenous injection of paracetamol in combination with 4ml of intravenous saline serum (placebo) with 5ml nebulized of normal saline (placebo) during 10min as placebo.

Sponsors

University of Monastir
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-65 years * Clinical diagnosis of acute renal colic (defined as sudden sharp colicky flank pain with or without radiation to the genitalia or groin, and with or without urinary symptoms) * Pain score of 5 or more measured using the 10-cm NRS scale

Exclusion criteria

* History of cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, or metabolic diseases * Evidence of sepsis or clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection * Hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg) * Uncontrolled diabetes * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Inability to understand verbal and/or written information * Received any analgesics within 6 hours prior to presentation * Serum potassium \< 3.7 mmol/L * Concomitant use of: Any beta-blockers (including beta-blocker-containing eye drops) Prolonged-release long-acting β-agonists Short-acting β2-agonists within 6 hours prior to presentation * Contraindication to terbutaline use * Known allergy to paracetamol or terbutaline * Abdominal tenderness suggestive of peritoneal inflammation * Clinical suspicion of conditions other than urolithiasis, including: * Abdominal aortic aneurysm * Aortic dissection * History of drug dependence or chronic alcohol consumption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change level of NRS by 50%.120 minutes post-interventionThe efficacy of the drug with regards to reducing the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) A scale from 0 to 10 with 0 meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "worst imaginable pain."during the follow-up. Criteria for treatment response was determined as pain reduction level by 50% based on the primary NRS score or NRS score of four or lower.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effects120 minutes post-interventionThe occurrence of adverse effects
Rescue analgesia.120 minutes post-interventionThe number of patients who need rescue analgesia.

Countries

Tunisia

Contacts

CONTACTSemir Nouira, Professor
semir.nouira.urg@gmail.com216_731-06046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 16, 2026